What happens to a wavefunction upon measurement when there's degeneracy?












3












$begingroup$


I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






quantum-mechanics quantum-states







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






    quantum-mechanics quantum-states







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






      quantum-mechanics quantum-states







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






      quantum-mechanics quantum-states




      quantum-mechanics quantum-states






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 6 hours ago









      PiKindOfGuyPiKindOfGuy

      493515




      493515






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago



















          3












          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458360%2fwhat-happens-to-a-wavefunction-upon-measurement-when-theres-degeneracy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago
















          4












          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Ben CrowellBen Crowell

          50.3k5155296




          50.3k5155296












          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago











          3












          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero

          19.6k53159




          19.6k53159












          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458360%2fwhat-happens-to-a-wavefunction-upon-measurement-when-theres-degeneracy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Fluorita

          Image
          Fluorita Fluorita (blau) amb pirita (daurat). Fórmula química CaF 2 Epònim fluor Localitat tipus Jáchymov Classificació Categoria Halurs Nickel-Strunz 10a ed. 3.AB.25 Nickel-Strunz 9a ed. 3.AB.25 Nickel-Strunz 8a ed. III/A.08 Dana 9.2.1.1 Heys 8.4.7 Propietats Sistema cristal·lí Cúbic Hàbit cristal·lí Sol presentar cubs; menys freqüentment dodecaedres. De vegades hexaoctaedres i tetrahexaedres. Per la combinació d'aquestes formes, les arestes dels cubs són sovint modificades. De vegades els cristalls poden presentar diferències de creixement entre les cares. Sovint s'observen cristalls compostos per sobrecreixement. Pot ser massiva, compacta, terrosa, columnar (poc freqüent), globular en agregats o botroïdal. Estructura cristal·lina a = 5.4626Å Simetria Classe (H-M): m 3 m (4/ m 3 2/ m ) - Hexoctaèdric; Grup espacial: Fm 3 m Color Blanc, groc, verd, violeta, vermell, rosa, blau o negre Mac...
          Read more

          Hulsita

          Image
          Hulsita Hulsita de la localitat tipus Fórmula química Fe 2+ 2 Fe 3+ O 2 BO 3 Epònim Alfred Hulse Brooks Localitat tipus mont Brooks, península de Seward, Nome Borough, Alaska, Estats Units Classificació Categoria borats Nickel-Strunz 10a ed. 6.AB.45 Nickel-Strunz 9a ed. 6.AB.45 Nickel-Strunz 8a ed. V/G.03 Dana 24.2.3.1 Heys 9.6.4 Propietats Sistema cristal·lí monoclínic Estructura cristal·lina a = 10,68Å; b = 3,09Å; c = 5,43Å; β = 94,15° Color negre Macles en [001]; un membre de la macla es troba girat 120° en relació a l'altre Exfoliació bona en {110} Duresa 3 Lluïssor vítria, submetàl·lica Densitat 4,28 g/cm 3 (mesurada); Més informació Estatus IMA mineral heretat (G) i mineral heretat (G) Any d'aprovació 1908 Referències [1] La hulsita és un mineral de la classe dels borats, que pertany al grup de la pinakiolita. Rep el seu nom en honor del nord-americà ...
          Read more

          Península de Txukotka

          Image
          Península de Txukotka Tipus Península Ubicació 66° N, 172° O  /  66°N , 172°O  / 66; -172 Mar mar dels Txuktxis La península de Txukotka a l'extrem oriental de Sibèria La península de Txukotka o península dels Txuktxis (en rus Чуко́тский полуо́стров , Txukotski poluóstrov ) és una península que es troba a l'extrem oriental d'Euràsia. Contingut 1 Descripció 2 Població 3 Vegeu també 4 Bibliografia Descripció L'estret de Bering, entre la península de Txukotka i la península de Seward a Alaska Foto de satèl·lit de la zona amb la península de Txukotka a l'esquerra El seu punt més extrem és el cap Dezhnev a la vora del nucli d'Uelen, un dels poquíssims llocs habitats de la zona. Al nord limita amb el mar dels Txuktxis i amb el mar de Bering al sud i amb l'estret de Bering a l'est. A la costa sud es troben la badia de Sant Lawrence i la badia de Kresta. La penínsu...
          Read more