Question relating to a number theoretic function
$begingroup$
Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?
One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;
Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$
Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...
If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e
$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).
I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?
One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;
Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$
Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...
If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e
$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).
I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?
One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;
Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$
Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...
If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e
$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).
I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?
One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;
Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$
Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...
If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e
$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).
I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
number-theory elementary-number-theory
asked 2 hours ago
acreativenameacreativename
14718
14718
$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3205369%2fquestion-relating-to-a-number-theoretic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$
$endgroup$
Hint:
For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$
answered 1 hour ago
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.6k24090
54.6k24090
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3205369%2fquestion-relating-to-a-number-theoretic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago