How to benchmark performance before jumping into match












1















I'd like to make the game look as good as possible, but also dont want to drop to 10FPS in the middle on a match.



Any way to tryout a high CPU consuming scenario before jumping into a game? (So I can try to maximize performance but keep it over 30 FPS)






overwatch







share|improve this question


















  • 3





    Unless your CPU is very old (like Core2Duo-old or older) or very low end, chances are Overwatch's performance is bottlenecked by your GPU instead. Besides, is there a reason why you think the Training mode isn't good enough as benchmark?

    – Nolonar
    Jul 5 '16 at 22:19
















1















I'd like to make the game look as good as possible, but also dont want to drop to 10FPS in the middle on a match.



Any way to tryout a high CPU consuming scenario before jumping into a game? (So I can try to maximize performance but keep it over 30 FPS)






overwatch







share|improve this question


















  • 3





    Unless your CPU is very old (like Core2Duo-old or older) or very low end, chances are Overwatch's performance is bottlenecked by your GPU instead. Besides, is there a reason why you think the Training mode isn't good enough as benchmark?

    – Nolonar
    Jul 5 '16 at 22:19














1












1








1








I'd like to make the game look as good as possible, but also dont want to drop to 10FPS in the middle on a match.



Any way to tryout a high CPU consuming scenario before jumping into a game? (So I can try to maximize performance but keep it over 30 FPS)






overwatch







share|improve this question














I'd like to make the game look as good as possible, but also dont want to drop to 10FPS in the middle on a match.



Any way to tryout a high CPU consuming scenario before jumping into a game? (So I can try to maximize performance but keep it over 30 FPS)






overwatch




overwatch






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 5 '16 at 22:16









Fredy31Fredy31

14.5k54158313




14.5k54158313








  • 3





    Unless your CPU is very old (like Core2Duo-old or older) or very low end, chances are Overwatch's performance is bottlenecked by your GPU instead. Besides, is there a reason why you think the Training mode isn't good enough as benchmark?

    – Nolonar
    Jul 5 '16 at 22:19














  • 3





    Unless your CPU is very old (like Core2Duo-old or older) or very low end, chances are Overwatch's performance is bottlenecked by your GPU instead. Besides, is there a reason why you think the Training mode isn't good enough as benchmark?

    – Nolonar
    Jul 5 '16 at 22:19








3




3





Unless your CPU is very old (like Core2Duo-old or older) or very low end, chances are Overwatch's performance is bottlenecked by your GPU instead. Besides, is there a reason why you think the Training mode isn't good enough as benchmark?

– Nolonar
Jul 5 '16 at 22:19





Unless your CPU is very old (like Core2Duo-old or older) or very low end, chances are Overwatch's performance is bottlenecked by your GPU instead. Besides, is there a reason why you think the Training mode isn't good enough as benchmark?

– Nolonar
Jul 5 '16 at 22:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














There is no video benchmark in overwatch test your hardwares capabilities.



But you can either play a regular game vs. AI. This would fill up your team with random players.



Or you can create a custom game and fill both teams with AI.



You can't really simulate the most demanding situations but you get an idea about where you are in terms of frame drops. In case of the 30 FPS as your lower limit, better make sure you don't drop below 35 FPS while testing.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

    – NBN-Alex
    Jul 6 '16 at 9:55











  • Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

    – Fredy31
    Jul 6 '16 at 13:53










protected by Studoku 5 hours ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














There is no video benchmark in overwatch test your hardwares capabilities.



But you can either play a regular game vs. AI. This would fill up your team with random players.



Or you can create a custom game and fill both teams with AI.



You can't really simulate the most demanding situations but you get an idea about where you are in terms of frame drops. In case of the 30 FPS as your lower limit, better make sure you don't drop below 35 FPS while testing.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

    – NBN-Alex
    Jul 6 '16 at 9:55











  • Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

    – Fredy31
    Jul 6 '16 at 13:53
















5














There is no video benchmark in overwatch test your hardwares capabilities.



But you can either play a regular game vs. AI. This would fill up your team with random players.



Or you can create a custom game and fill both teams with AI.



You can't really simulate the most demanding situations but you get an idea about where you are in terms of frame drops. In case of the 30 FPS as your lower limit, better make sure you don't drop below 35 FPS while testing.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

    – NBN-Alex
    Jul 6 '16 at 9:55











  • Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

    – Fredy31
    Jul 6 '16 at 13:53














5












5








5







There is no video benchmark in overwatch test your hardwares capabilities.



But you can either play a regular game vs. AI. This would fill up your team with random players.



Or you can create a custom game and fill both teams with AI.



You can't really simulate the most demanding situations but you get an idea about where you are in terms of frame drops. In case of the 30 FPS as your lower limit, better make sure you don't drop below 35 FPS while testing.






share|improve this answer













There is no video benchmark in overwatch test your hardwares capabilities.



But you can either play a regular game vs. AI. This would fill up your team with random players.



Or you can create a custom game and fill both teams with AI.



You can't really simulate the most demanding situations but you get an idea about where you are in terms of frame drops. In case of the 30 FPS as your lower limit, better make sure you don't drop below 35 FPS while testing.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 6 '16 at 7:44









sbeckersbecker

25113




25113













  • Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

    – NBN-Alex
    Jul 6 '16 at 9:55











  • Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

    – Fredy31
    Jul 6 '16 at 13:53



















  • Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

    – NBN-Alex
    Jul 6 '16 at 9:55











  • Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

    – Fredy31
    Jul 6 '16 at 13:53

















Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

– NBN-Alex
Jul 6 '16 at 9:55





Good answer. The training mode itself is too clean of debris and multiple targets using flashy ults. A solo bot match would provide better results.

– NBN-Alex
Jul 6 '16 at 9:55













Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

– Fredy31
Jul 6 '16 at 13:53





Thanks for the answer. That was my plan B, but it seems the plan A doesn't exist. My Plan A was something like in the Tomb Raider Reboot that would try to render things that are hard for computers to run to be able to see the dip in the FPS. But seems that this doesn't exist.

– Fredy31
Jul 6 '16 at 13:53





protected by Studoku 5 hours ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



-

Popular posts from this blog

Fluorita

Image
Fluorita Fluorita (blau) amb pirita (daurat). Fórmula química CaF 2 Epònim fluor Localitat tipus Jáchymov Classificació Categoria Halurs Nickel-Strunz 10a ed. 3.AB.25 Nickel-Strunz 9a ed. 3.AB.25 Nickel-Strunz 8a ed. III/A.08 Dana 9.2.1.1 Heys 8.4.7 Propietats Sistema cristal·lí Cúbic Hàbit cristal·lí Sol presentar cubs; menys freqüentment dodecaedres. De vegades hexaoctaedres i tetrahexaedres. Per la combinació d'aquestes formes, les arestes dels cubs són sovint modificades. De vegades els cristalls poden presentar diferències de creixement entre les cares. Sovint s'observen cristalls compostos per sobrecreixement. Pot ser massiva, compacta, terrosa, columnar (poc freqüent), globular en agregats o botroïdal. Estructura cristal·lina a = 5.4626Å Simetria Classe (H-M): m 3 m (4/ m 3 2/ m ) - Hexoctaèdric; Grup espacial: Fm 3 m Color Blanc, groc, verd, violeta, vermell, rosa, blau o negre Mac...
Read more

Hulsita

Image
Hulsita Hulsita de la localitat tipus Fórmula química Fe 2+ 2 Fe 3+ O 2 BO 3 Epònim Alfred Hulse Brooks Localitat tipus mont Brooks, península de Seward, Nome Borough, Alaska, Estats Units Classificació Categoria borats Nickel-Strunz 10a ed. 6.AB.45 Nickel-Strunz 9a ed. 6.AB.45 Nickel-Strunz 8a ed. V/G.03 Dana 24.2.3.1 Heys 9.6.4 Propietats Sistema cristal·lí monoclínic Estructura cristal·lina a = 10,68Å; b = 3,09Å; c = 5,43Å; β = 94,15° Color negre Macles en [001]; un membre de la macla es troba girat 120° en relació a l'altre Exfoliació bona en {110} Duresa 3 Lluïssor vítria, submetàl·lica Densitat 4,28 g/cm 3 (mesurada); Més informació Estatus IMA mineral heretat (G) i mineral heretat (G) Any d'aprovació 1908 Referències [1] La hulsita és un mineral de la classe dels borats, que pertany al grup de la pinakiolita. Rep el seu nom en honor del nord-americà ...
Read more

Península de Txukotka

Image
Península de Txukotka Tipus Península Ubicació 66° N, 172° O  /  66°N , 172°O  / 66; -172 Mar mar dels Txuktxis La península de Txukotka a l'extrem oriental de Sibèria La península de Txukotka o península dels Txuktxis (en rus Чуко́тский полуо́стров , Txukotski poluóstrov ) és una península que es troba a l'extrem oriental d'Euràsia. Contingut 1 Descripció 2 Població 3 Vegeu també 4 Bibliografia Descripció L'estret de Bering, entre la península de Txukotka i la península de Seward a Alaska Foto de satèl·lit de la zona amb la península de Txukotka a l'esquerra El seu punt més extrem és el cap Dezhnev a la vora del nucli d'Uelen, un dels poquíssims llocs habitats de la zona. Al nord limita amb el mar dels Txuktxis i amb el mar de Bering al sud i amb l'estret de Bering a l'est. A la costa sud es troben la badia de Sant Lawrence i la badia de Kresta. La penínsu...
Read more