Should I be expected to insure hardware belonging to my employer when going on a trip?












24














I'm soon off abroad for a few months and will be working remotely, taking the company laptop and possibly other similar hardware with me to perform my duties.



My employer has asked if I could insure the hardware through my travel insurance, saying that he doubts the company policy will cover the USA (we're based in the UK).



As the hardware itself does not belong to me and is needed to fulfil my job (without any clauses covering insurance in my contract), is this something I can reasonably be expected to do?










share|improve this question







New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 18




    Are you being sent abroad by your employer, or is this your own choice and have you reached an agreement about working remotely for that time?
    – Erik
    18 hours ago






  • 6




    It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    "My employer has asked if I could ensure the hardware through my travel insurance" - My response to this request is, once you provide reimbursement for the cost, I will do exactly that. Since this is a personal trip, I would expect this request to be denied, which would mean I wouldn't travel with their hardware on a personal trip.
    – Ramhound
    17 hours ago








  • 6




    If you were staying put, but bringing company hardware home to work from home, would you expect to carry homeowner's insurance that covered it? Would you expect to be reimbursed for that?
    – dwizum
    17 hours ago






  • 14




    Tangential to the asked question, but do you have legal permission to work in the US? A normal tourist visa won't allow you to do so.
    – Dan Neely
    14 hours ago
















24














I'm soon off abroad for a few months and will be working remotely, taking the company laptop and possibly other similar hardware with me to perform my duties.



My employer has asked if I could insure the hardware through my travel insurance, saying that he doubts the company policy will cover the USA (we're based in the UK).



As the hardware itself does not belong to me and is needed to fulfil my job (without any clauses covering insurance in my contract), is this something I can reasonably be expected to do?










share|improve this question







New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 18




    Are you being sent abroad by your employer, or is this your own choice and have you reached an agreement about working remotely for that time?
    – Erik
    18 hours ago






  • 6




    It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    "My employer has asked if I could ensure the hardware through my travel insurance" - My response to this request is, once you provide reimbursement for the cost, I will do exactly that. Since this is a personal trip, I would expect this request to be denied, which would mean I wouldn't travel with their hardware on a personal trip.
    – Ramhound
    17 hours ago








  • 6




    If you were staying put, but bringing company hardware home to work from home, would you expect to carry homeowner's insurance that covered it? Would you expect to be reimbursed for that?
    – dwizum
    17 hours ago






  • 14




    Tangential to the asked question, but do you have legal permission to work in the US? A normal tourist visa won't allow you to do so.
    – Dan Neely
    14 hours ago














24












24








24







I'm soon off abroad for a few months and will be working remotely, taking the company laptop and possibly other similar hardware with me to perform my duties.



My employer has asked if I could insure the hardware through my travel insurance, saying that he doubts the company policy will cover the USA (we're based in the UK).



As the hardware itself does not belong to me and is needed to fulfil my job (without any clauses covering insurance in my contract), is this something I can reasonably be expected to do?










share|improve this question







New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm soon off abroad for a few months and will be working remotely, taking the company laptop and possibly other similar hardware with me to perform my duties.



My employer has asked if I could insure the hardware through my travel insurance, saying that he doubts the company policy will cover the USA (we're based in the UK).



As the hardware itself does not belong to me and is needed to fulfil my job (without any clauses covering insurance in my contract), is this something I can reasonably be expected to do?







telecommute travel insurance hardware






share|improve this question







New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 18 hours ago









GroomedGorillaGroomedGorilla

22414




22414




New contributor




GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






GroomedGorilla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 18




    Are you being sent abroad by your employer, or is this your own choice and have you reached an agreement about working remotely for that time?
    – Erik
    18 hours ago






  • 6




    It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    "My employer has asked if I could ensure the hardware through my travel insurance" - My response to this request is, once you provide reimbursement for the cost, I will do exactly that. Since this is a personal trip, I would expect this request to be denied, which would mean I wouldn't travel with their hardware on a personal trip.
    – Ramhound
    17 hours ago








  • 6




    If you were staying put, but bringing company hardware home to work from home, would you expect to carry homeowner's insurance that covered it? Would you expect to be reimbursed for that?
    – dwizum
    17 hours ago






  • 14




    Tangential to the asked question, but do you have legal permission to work in the US? A normal tourist visa won't allow you to do so.
    – Dan Neely
    14 hours ago














  • 18




    Are you being sent abroad by your employer, or is this your own choice and have you reached an agreement about working remotely for that time?
    – Erik
    18 hours ago






  • 6




    It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    "My employer has asked if I could ensure the hardware through my travel insurance" - My response to this request is, once you provide reimbursement for the cost, I will do exactly that. Since this is a personal trip, I would expect this request to be denied, which would mean I wouldn't travel with their hardware on a personal trip.
    – Ramhound
    17 hours ago








  • 6




    If you were staying put, but bringing company hardware home to work from home, would you expect to carry homeowner's insurance that covered it? Would you expect to be reimbursed for that?
    – dwizum
    17 hours ago






  • 14




    Tangential to the asked question, but do you have legal permission to work in the US? A normal tourist visa won't allow you to do so.
    – Dan Neely
    14 hours ago








18




18




Are you being sent abroad by your employer, or is this your own choice and have you reached an agreement about working remotely for that time?
– Erik
18 hours ago




Are you being sent abroad by your employer, or is this your own choice and have you reached an agreement about working remotely for that time?
– Erik
18 hours ago




6




6




It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)
– GroomedGorilla
18 hours ago




It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)
– GroomedGorilla
18 hours ago




11




11




"My employer has asked if I could ensure the hardware through my travel insurance" - My response to this request is, once you provide reimbursement for the cost, I will do exactly that. Since this is a personal trip, I would expect this request to be denied, which would mean I wouldn't travel with their hardware on a personal trip.
– Ramhound
17 hours ago






"My employer has asked if I could ensure the hardware through my travel insurance" - My response to this request is, once you provide reimbursement for the cost, I will do exactly that. Since this is a personal trip, I would expect this request to be denied, which would mean I wouldn't travel with their hardware on a personal trip.
– Ramhound
17 hours ago






6




6




If you were staying put, but bringing company hardware home to work from home, would you expect to carry homeowner's insurance that covered it? Would you expect to be reimbursed for that?
– dwizum
17 hours ago




If you were staying put, but bringing company hardware home to work from home, would you expect to carry homeowner's insurance that covered it? Would you expect to be reimbursed for that?
– dwizum
17 hours ago




14




14




Tangential to the asked question, but do you have legal permission to work in the US? A normal tourist visa won't allow you to do so.
– Dan Neely
14 hours ago




Tangential to the asked question, but do you have legal permission to work in the US? A normal tourist visa won't allow you to do so.
– Dan Neely
14 hours ago










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















35














Firstly, check if your travel insurance covers business, or if it's just a tourist coverage.



Secondly... I'd be a bit suspicious of any company that requires me to insure their own property (you can't buy insurance on an item that you don't have any financial interest in), or any company that can't self-insure something as cheap as a laptop (even a Macbook Pro is pretty cheap in the scheme of things).






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
    – Bill Leeper
    15 hours ago










  • What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
    – Gherman
    13 hours ago






  • 2




    @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
    – Abigail
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
    – Moo
    4 hours ago










  • @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago



















23














You have a little bit outside the box problem here.




  1. You are voluntarily traveling, this is not for business, but yourself.

  2. The company wants to minimize the obvious risk of losing their equipment while you are jetting around the world (their view, not yours)

  3. Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.


You need to have a conversation with your manager. Indicate that since the equipment belongs to the company and not yourself, you will be unable to obtain any insurance coverage for it on your own. If they would like to obtain additional coverage than what they normally carry, then you could have a discussion about having that additional expense reduced from your salary.



In summary this is how I see it.




  1. You are voluntarily making this trip, it is not business related or directed.

  2. The company owns the equipment though, so they need to make whatever arrangements they see fit.

  3. You will have to decide if you can accept what they come up with or work out your own plan.


Additionally if you were to buy your own equipment and use it for work while traveling you would need to additionally indicate with the insurance company that you are using this equipment for work, they may reject a claim at some point if you did not indicate this.



This will NOT be travel insurance, that is for if you get sick etc. and have to cancel your trip. You need to look into a 'personal articles' policy (US terminology your local agent can help you determine the right UK coverage). This is insurance that covers a specific item. I have it on several computers, my wife's expensive jewelry and a few other items easily lost, damaged, or stolen.






share|improve this answer

















  • 11




    "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
    – Voo
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
    – patstew
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
    – Jan Fabry
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
    – Voo
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
    – Jan Dorniak
    11 hours ago



















11














It's a tricky issue.




  1. The "overseas" aspect is not relevant. The issue at hand is just, "Do you have to pay for accidental damage to equipment the company supplied." This would apply whether you broke it in your house, commuting, in Patagonia or indeed even at the office.


  2. My personal view is that the company just has to suck it up and pay.


  3. Particularly in the wildly-paid, go-go world of software today ... it's hard to see that you can make a programmer do .. well, anything.


  4. For me personally (only one example) if one of the folks smashes something or loses it, I just sigh, click to Amazon, and hand out another one :/ What are we gonna do, fire them and spend 3 months / 50k finding another expert in some obscure field?


  5. Then again - I know that some companies policies is "Wow! We give you $2800 a year against equipment costs!" (you see this sort of blather in a few job ads on OS, from companies trying to hire programmers cheap) In that case, it would probably be reasonable that "that's it" - if you lose the 2500 bucks, or whatever, it's on you to dig up another laptop.



So one opinion, basically "they should pay in almost all cases"



That being said,




  1. It sounds like you're getting a "sweet deal" from your employer - they are letting you work remotely while you fool around in the US? If so .. my gut instinct is to "suck it up".


NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.




  1. If however the company is "sending you to" the US on a project - then, flooglestick 'em. Of course, obviously, they have to pay the insurance/etc. End of story.




Even more information!




"It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)"




One immediate fact:




  • As a kind of broad general rule, if you work remotely then you pay for your own gear. This is not a firm rule, but it's a general rule.


And then,



Looking again at point (6). I have to say, I would treat this as a point 6 situation. They are being understanding taking the view that "they don't have a problem with it". {Aside: let's see what they say in a month when they realize the time zone issues.} Just one man's opinion then, you should "go the extra mile" and politely cover the danger yourself.



NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
    – Fattie
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
    – Kilisi
    14 hours ago










  • I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
    – Dragonel
    10 hours ago



















4














Given that you already work remotely and the equipment is not already insured, you should not be required to insure this equipment just because you are going to a separate remote location.



If the company would like their equipment insured, they should do it themselves.






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
    – GroomedGorilla
    16 hours ago










  • The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
    – Andy
    8 hours ago










  • @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
    – Moo
    4 hours ago



















0














If it's a work trip (i.e. they are sending you) then it's their responsibility, if it's a personal trip it's reasonable to expect the employee to cover it.






share|improve this answer





















  • While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
    – Fattie
    18 hours ago








  • 1




    If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
    – Nuclear Wang
    18 hours ago










  • @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
    – Moo
    4 hours ago



















0














Check with your employer if you can return your current hardware to them and they can purchase and insure a new hardware to the location you are traveling to.



Regarding retaining your important data, you can perform backup of important things in a physical drive which is easily available and easy to carry while traveling and will be with you in case you need to use that data to setup new system. If they agree, Return the hardware as it is so they can make necessary backup procedures and also allocate it to different person.



This will bar you from worrying from how to insure your hardware as it will be up-to your employer to decide.






share|improve this answer





























    -2














    The point that everyone seems to strenuously ignore is that you can only insure something that you own. So here any solution must come from the employer's insurance, not the employee. But it's OK, it would probably be cheaper anyway. and it'd only be a fairly routine extension of their existing 'stuff insurance'.



    I also disagree with the 'programmers are precious, suck it up' philosophy. The OP's employer is already being gracious about letting them roam around all over the world. There's no harm in being gracious back and offering to reimburse them for the extra cost of insurance. Why alienate people gratuitously? The programmers are precious situation could change more rapidly than you can imagine, and this kind of attitude will be remembered if a cull is needed.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
      – Voo
      11 hours ago










    • You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
      – Moo
      4 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    GroomedGorilla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125988%2fshould-i-be-expected-to-insure-hardware-belonging-to-my-employer-when-going-on-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown




















    StackExchange.ready(function () {
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
    var showEditor = function() {
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    };

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True') {
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup({
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup) {
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
    }
    })
    } else{
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
    showEditor();
    }
    }
    });
    });






    7 Answers
    7






    active

    oldest

    votes








    7 Answers
    7






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    35














    Firstly, check if your travel insurance covers business, or if it's just a tourist coverage.



    Secondly... I'd be a bit suspicious of any company that requires me to insure their own property (you can't buy insurance on an item that you don't have any financial interest in), or any company that can't self-insure something as cheap as a laptop (even a Macbook Pro is pretty cheap in the scheme of things).






    share|improve this answer

















    • 5




      I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
      – Bill Leeper
      15 hours ago










    • What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
      – Gherman
      13 hours ago






    • 2




      @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
      – Abigail
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago










    • @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
      – corsiKa
      2 hours ago
















    35














    Firstly, check if your travel insurance covers business, or if it's just a tourist coverage.



    Secondly... I'd be a bit suspicious of any company that requires me to insure their own property (you can't buy insurance on an item that you don't have any financial interest in), or any company that can't self-insure something as cheap as a laptop (even a Macbook Pro is pretty cheap in the scheme of things).






    share|improve this answer

















    • 5




      I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
      – Bill Leeper
      15 hours ago










    • What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
      – Gherman
      13 hours ago






    • 2




      @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
      – Abigail
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago










    • @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
      – corsiKa
      2 hours ago














    35












    35








    35






    Firstly, check if your travel insurance covers business, or if it's just a tourist coverage.



    Secondly... I'd be a bit suspicious of any company that requires me to insure their own property (you can't buy insurance on an item that you don't have any financial interest in), or any company that can't self-insure something as cheap as a laptop (even a Macbook Pro is pretty cheap in the scheme of things).






    share|improve this answer












    Firstly, check if your travel insurance covers business, or if it's just a tourist coverage.



    Secondly... I'd be a bit suspicious of any company that requires me to insure their own property (you can't buy insurance on an item that you don't have any financial interest in), or any company that can't self-insure something as cheap as a laptop (even a Macbook Pro is pretty cheap in the scheme of things).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 18 hours ago









    PeteConPeteCon

    14.7k43960




    14.7k43960








    • 5




      I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
      – Bill Leeper
      15 hours ago










    • What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
      – Gherman
      13 hours ago






    • 2




      @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
      – Abigail
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago










    • @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
      – corsiKa
      2 hours ago














    • 5




      I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
      – Bill Leeper
      15 hours ago










    • What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
      – Gherman
      13 hours ago






    • 2




      @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
      – Abigail
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago










    • @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
      – corsiKa
      2 hours ago








    5




    5




    I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
    – Bill Leeper
    15 hours ago




    I don't think travel insurance covers your stuff, just the cost of your trip should you get sick or there be some adverse situation where you are visiting that resulted in flights or hotel cancellations. Your stuff is usually covered under your own insurance as part of your renters or homeowners coverage. That usually has a deductible and if home, will likely be higher than the cost of the computer. The employer is really saying here if something happens to our stuff while you are traveling for pleasure it's on you to replace.
    – Bill Leeper
    15 hours ago












    What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
    – Gherman
    13 hours ago




    What if a company consists of 5 employees? In that scheme of things it wouldn't be that cheap.
    – Gherman
    13 hours ago




    2




    2




    @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
    – Abigail
    11 hours ago




    @BillLeeper My travel insurance does cover items getting lost/damaged while travelling. My homeowners coverage does not.
    – Abigail
    11 hours ago




    2




    2




    This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
    – Moo
    4 hours ago




    This is an unusual situation since the trip is not a business trip but a personal trip the OP wants to work on, presumably to avoid taking the time as annual leave - the employer could equally say "if you don't take out insurance, you need to leave your laptop at home and take the time as annual leave instead". Which is best is left for the OP to decide...
    – Moo
    4 hours ago












    @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago




    @Gherman Sorry but being in a 5 person business myself, that's a sorry excuse. Sure there's less money, but there's also less heads to divide that money amongst.
    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago













    23














    You have a little bit outside the box problem here.




    1. You are voluntarily traveling, this is not for business, but yourself.

    2. The company wants to minimize the obvious risk of losing their equipment while you are jetting around the world (their view, not yours)

    3. Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.


    You need to have a conversation with your manager. Indicate that since the equipment belongs to the company and not yourself, you will be unable to obtain any insurance coverage for it on your own. If they would like to obtain additional coverage than what they normally carry, then you could have a discussion about having that additional expense reduced from your salary.



    In summary this is how I see it.




    1. You are voluntarily making this trip, it is not business related or directed.

    2. The company owns the equipment though, so they need to make whatever arrangements they see fit.

    3. You will have to decide if you can accept what they come up with or work out your own plan.


    Additionally if you were to buy your own equipment and use it for work while traveling you would need to additionally indicate with the insurance company that you are using this equipment for work, they may reject a claim at some point if you did not indicate this.



    This will NOT be travel insurance, that is for if you get sick etc. and have to cancel your trip. You need to look into a 'personal articles' policy (US terminology your local agent can help you determine the right UK coverage). This is insurance that covers a specific item. I have it on several computers, my wife's expensive jewelry and a few other items easily lost, damaged, or stolen.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 11




      "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
      – Voo
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
      – patstew
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
      – Jan Fabry
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
      – Voo
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
      – Jan Dorniak
      11 hours ago
















    23














    You have a little bit outside the box problem here.




    1. You are voluntarily traveling, this is not for business, but yourself.

    2. The company wants to minimize the obvious risk of losing their equipment while you are jetting around the world (their view, not yours)

    3. Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.


    You need to have a conversation with your manager. Indicate that since the equipment belongs to the company and not yourself, you will be unable to obtain any insurance coverage for it on your own. If they would like to obtain additional coverage than what they normally carry, then you could have a discussion about having that additional expense reduced from your salary.



    In summary this is how I see it.




    1. You are voluntarily making this trip, it is not business related or directed.

    2. The company owns the equipment though, so they need to make whatever arrangements they see fit.

    3. You will have to decide if you can accept what they come up with or work out your own plan.


    Additionally if you were to buy your own equipment and use it for work while traveling you would need to additionally indicate with the insurance company that you are using this equipment for work, they may reject a claim at some point if you did not indicate this.



    This will NOT be travel insurance, that is for if you get sick etc. and have to cancel your trip. You need to look into a 'personal articles' policy (US terminology your local agent can help you determine the right UK coverage). This is insurance that covers a specific item. I have it on several computers, my wife's expensive jewelry and a few other items easily lost, damaged, or stolen.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 11




      "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
      – Voo
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
      – patstew
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
      – Jan Fabry
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
      – Voo
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
      – Jan Dorniak
      11 hours ago














    23












    23








    23






    You have a little bit outside the box problem here.




    1. You are voluntarily traveling, this is not for business, but yourself.

    2. The company wants to minimize the obvious risk of losing their equipment while you are jetting around the world (their view, not yours)

    3. Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.


    You need to have a conversation with your manager. Indicate that since the equipment belongs to the company and not yourself, you will be unable to obtain any insurance coverage for it on your own. If they would like to obtain additional coverage than what they normally carry, then you could have a discussion about having that additional expense reduced from your salary.



    In summary this is how I see it.




    1. You are voluntarily making this trip, it is not business related or directed.

    2. The company owns the equipment though, so they need to make whatever arrangements they see fit.

    3. You will have to decide if you can accept what they come up with or work out your own plan.


    Additionally if you were to buy your own equipment and use it for work while traveling you would need to additionally indicate with the insurance company that you are using this equipment for work, they may reject a claim at some point if you did not indicate this.



    This will NOT be travel insurance, that is for if you get sick etc. and have to cancel your trip. You need to look into a 'personal articles' policy (US terminology your local agent can help you determine the right UK coverage). This is insurance that covers a specific item. I have it on several computers, my wife's expensive jewelry and a few other items easily lost, damaged, or stolen.






    share|improve this answer












    You have a little bit outside the box problem here.




    1. You are voluntarily traveling, this is not for business, but yourself.

    2. The company wants to minimize the obvious risk of losing their equipment while you are jetting around the world (their view, not yours)

    3. Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.


    You need to have a conversation with your manager. Indicate that since the equipment belongs to the company and not yourself, you will be unable to obtain any insurance coverage for it on your own. If they would like to obtain additional coverage than what they normally carry, then you could have a discussion about having that additional expense reduced from your salary.



    In summary this is how I see it.




    1. You are voluntarily making this trip, it is not business related or directed.

    2. The company owns the equipment though, so they need to make whatever arrangements they see fit.

    3. You will have to decide if you can accept what they come up with or work out your own plan.


    Additionally if you were to buy your own equipment and use it for work while traveling you would need to additionally indicate with the insurance company that you are using this equipment for work, they may reject a claim at some point if you did not indicate this.



    This will NOT be travel insurance, that is for if you get sick etc. and have to cancel your trip. You need to look into a 'personal articles' policy (US terminology your local agent can help you determine the right UK coverage). This is insurance that covers a specific item. I have it on several computers, my wife's expensive jewelry and a few other items easily lost, damaged, or stolen.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 18 hours ago









    Bill LeeperBill Leeper

    11.9k2938




    11.9k2938








    • 11




      "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
      – Voo
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
      – patstew
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
      – Jan Fabry
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
      – Voo
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
      – Jan Dorniak
      11 hours ago














    • 11




      "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
      – Voo
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
      – patstew
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
      – Jan Fabry
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
      – Voo
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
      – Jan Dorniak
      11 hours ago








    11




    11




    "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
    – Voo
    13 hours ago




    "Any insurance YOU buy is NOT going to cover something you do not own, period.". That seems too general a statement. I buy car insurance for rental cars and I certainly don't own the car (and I don't have to use the insurance the renting agency offers, so it's not just a deal with the company itself). Now whether there exists any insurance for this particular case is a different question, but there's certainly no point blank reason for such a insurance impossible to exist.
    – Voo
    13 hours ago




    1




    1




    In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
    – patstew
    13 hours ago




    In the UK travel insurance routinely covers personal effects taken with you, at least for theft or loss outside your control.
    – patstew
    13 hours ago




    3




    3




    @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
    – Jan Fabry
    12 hours ago




    @Voo: Just checked this for my country (Belgium), and I can buy (extra) insurance that will also cover goods that I rent or borrow (as a private person, so goods from my employer are probably not covered). So it's certainly not impossible.
    – Jan Fabry
    12 hours ago




    2




    2




    @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
    – Voo
    12 hours ago




    @Bill No I don't necessarily buy car insurance from the rental company and it still works just fine. And sure the insurance company only pays the parts that aren't covered by other insurance, but that's quite common for many other insurances as well (I have a national and a private health insurance - is my private insurance now not an insurance any more because it only covers the parts that are not paid by the national one?). And as Jan mentioned he already found examples of being able to insure non-owned property, so clearly this is not just academic.
    – Voo
    12 hours ago




    1




    1




    @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
    – Jan Dorniak
    11 hours ago




    @Voo this seems a bit like liability insurance in the car case., That is you don't insure the care but rather insure yourself against being liable for damages you cause to the car. Same way my uni required chemistry students to have an insurance for accidental harm caused to others or equipment damage. Where I live the umbrella term is "civilian liability" or some such.
    – Jan Dorniak
    11 hours ago











    11














    It's a tricky issue.




    1. The "overseas" aspect is not relevant. The issue at hand is just, "Do you have to pay for accidental damage to equipment the company supplied." This would apply whether you broke it in your house, commuting, in Patagonia or indeed even at the office.


    2. My personal view is that the company just has to suck it up and pay.


    3. Particularly in the wildly-paid, go-go world of software today ... it's hard to see that you can make a programmer do .. well, anything.


    4. For me personally (only one example) if one of the folks smashes something or loses it, I just sigh, click to Amazon, and hand out another one :/ What are we gonna do, fire them and spend 3 months / 50k finding another expert in some obscure field?


    5. Then again - I know that some companies policies is "Wow! We give you $2800 a year against equipment costs!" (you see this sort of blather in a few job ads on OS, from companies trying to hire programmers cheap) In that case, it would probably be reasonable that "that's it" - if you lose the 2500 bucks, or whatever, it's on you to dig up another laptop.



    So one opinion, basically "they should pay in almost all cases"



    That being said,




    1. It sounds like you're getting a "sweet deal" from your employer - they are letting you work remotely while you fool around in the US? If so .. my gut instinct is to "suck it up".


    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.




    1. If however the company is "sending you to" the US on a project - then, flooglestick 'em. Of course, obviously, they have to pay the insurance/etc. End of story.




    Even more information!




    "It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)"




    One immediate fact:




    • As a kind of broad general rule, if you work remotely then you pay for your own gear. This is not a firm rule, but it's a general rule.


    And then,



    Looking again at point (6). I have to say, I would treat this as a point 6 situation. They are being understanding taking the view that "they don't have a problem with it". {Aside: let's see what they say in a month when they realize the time zone issues.} Just one man's opinion then, you should "go the extra mile" and politely cover the danger yourself.



    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
      – GroomedGorilla
      18 hours ago






    • 2




      It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
      – Kilisi
      14 hours ago










    • I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
      – Dragonel
      10 hours ago
















    11














    It's a tricky issue.




    1. The "overseas" aspect is not relevant. The issue at hand is just, "Do you have to pay for accidental damage to equipment the company supplied." This would apply whether you broke it in your house, commuting, in Patagonia or indeed even at the office.


    2. My personal view is that the company just has to suck it up and pay.


    3. Particularly in the wildly-paid, go-go world of software today ... it's hard to see that you can make a programmer do .. well, anything.


    4. For me personally (only one example) if one of the folks smashes something or loses it, I just sigh, click to Amazon, and hand out another one :/ What are we gonna do, fire them and spend 3 months / 50k finding another expert in some obscure field?


    5. Then again - I know that some companies policies is "Wow! We give you $2800 a year against equipment costs!" (you see this sort of blather in a few job ads on OS, from companies trying to hire programmers cheap) In that case, it would probably be reasonable that "that's it" - if you lose the 2500 bucks, or whatever, it's on you to dig up another laptop.



    So one opinion, basically "they should pay in almost all cases"



    That being said,




    1. It sounds like you're getting a "sweet deal" from your employer - they are letting you work remotely while you fool around in the US? If so .. my gut instinct is to "suck it up".


    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.




    1. If however the company is "sending you to" the US on a project - then, flooglestick 'em. Of course, obviously, they have to pay the insurance/etc. End of story.




    Even more information!




    "It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)"




    One immediate fact:




    • As a kind of broad general rule, if you work remotely then you pay for your own gear. This is not a firm rule, but it's a general rule.


    And then,



    Looking again at point (6). I have to say, I would treat this as a point 6 situation. They are being understanding taking the view that "they don't have a problem with it". {Aside: let's see what they say in a month when they realize the time zone issues.} Just one man's opinion then, you should "go the extra mile" and politely cover the danger yourself.



    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
      – GroomedGorilla
      18 hours ago






    • 2




      It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
      – Kilisi
      14 hours ago










    • I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
      – Dragonel
      10 hours ago














    11












    11








    11






    It's a tricky issue.




    1. The "overseas" aspect is not relevant. The issue at hand is just, "Do you have to pay for accidental damage to equipment the company supplied." This would apply whether you broke it in your house, commuting, in Patagonia or indeed even at the office.


    2. My personal view is that the company just has to suck it up and pay.


    3. Particularly in the wildly-paid, go-go world of software today ... it's hard to see that you can make a programmer do .. well, anything.


    4. For me personally (only one example) if one of the folks smashes something or loses it, I just sigh, click to Amazon, and hand out another one :/ What are we gonna do, fire them and spend 3 months / 50k finding another expert in some obscure field?


    5. Then again - I know that some companies policies is "Wow! We give you $2800 a year against equipment costs!" (you see this sort of blather in a few job ads on OS, from companies trying to hire programmers cheap) In that case, it would probably be reasonable that "that's it" - if you lose the 2500 bucks, or whatever, it's on you to dig up another laptop.



    So one opinion, basically "they should pay in almost all cases"



    That being said,




    1. It sounds like you're getting a "sweet deal" from your employer - they are letting you work remotely while you fool around in the US? If so .. my gut instinct is to "suck it up".


    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.




    1. If however the company is "sending you to" the US on a project - then, flooglestick 'em. Of course, obviously, they have to pay the insurance/etc. End of story.




    Even more information!




    "It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)"




    One immediate fact:




    • As a kind of broad general rule, if you work remotely then you pay for your own gear. This is not a firm rule, but it's a general rule.


    And then,



    Looking again at point (6). I have to say, I would treat this as a point 6 situation. They are being understanding taking the view that "they don't have a problem with it". {Aside: let's see what they say in a month when they realize the time zone issues.} Just one man's opinion then, you should "go the extra mile" and politely cover the danger yourself.



    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.






    share|improve this answer














    It's a tricky issue.




    1. The "overseas" aspect is not relevant. The issue at hand is just, "Do you have to pay for accidental damage to equipment the company supplied." This would apply whether you broke it in your house, commuting, in Patagonia or indeed even at the office.


    2. My personal view is that the company just has to suck it up and pay.


    3. Particularly in the wildly-paid, go-go world of software today ... it's hard to see that you can make a programmer do .. well, anything.


    4. For me personally (only one example) if one of the folks smashes something or loses it, I just sigh, click to Amazon, and hand out another one :/ What are we gonna do, fire them and spend 3 months / 50k finding another expert in some obscure field?


    5. Then again - I know that some companies policies is "Wow! We give you $2800 a year against equipment costs!" (you see this sort of blather in a few job ads on OS, from companies trying to hire programmers cheap) In that case, it would probably be reasonable that "that's it" - if you lose the 2500 bucks, or whatever, it's on you to dig up another laptop.



    So one opinion, basically "they should pay in almost all cases"



    That being said,




    1. It sounds like you're getting a "sweet deal" from your employer - they are letting you work remotely while you fool around in the US? If so .. my gut instinct is to "suck it up".


    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.




    1. If however the company is "sending you to" the US on a project - then, flooglestick 'em. Of course, obviously, they have to pay the insurance/etc. End of story.




    Even more information!




    "It's my own choice and they've said they'd have no problem with it (since I work remotely anyway)"




    One immediate fact:




    • As a kind of broad general rule, if you work remotely then you pay for your own gear. This is not a firm rule, but it's a general rule.


    And then,



    Looking again at point (6). I have to say, I would treat this as a point 6 situation. They are being understanding taking the view that "they don't have a problem with it". {Aside: let's see what they say in a month when they realize the time zone issues.} Just one man's opinion then, you should "go the extra mile" and politely cover the danger yourself.



    NOTE: Put it in writing that as a courtesy you will be insuring the laptop when overseas, and do so.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 18 hours ago

























    answered 18 hours ago









    FattieFattie

    7,60831327




    7,60831327








    • 1




      Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
      – GroomedGorilla
      18 hours ago






    • 2




      It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
      – Kilisi
      14 hours ago










    • I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
      – Dragonel
      10 hours ago














    • 1




      Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
      – GroomedGorilla
      18 hours ago






    • 2




      It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
      – Kilisi
      14 hours ago










    • I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
      – Dragonel
      10 hours ago








    1




    1




    Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago




    Not sure why you're getting downvoted but I tend to agree with you. If they were sending me then I'd expect them to pay. In this case it's my choice to go abroad, but I'm working remotely here anyway so it likely boils down to a policy that only covers the UK. I suppose I'll look into what extra costs I'd incur to add this to my travel insurance (and possibly a business option for that as @PeteCon suggested). And definitely ALWAYS getting these kind of things in writing
    – GroomedGorilla
    18 hours ago




    2




    2




    It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
    – Fattie
    18 hours ago




    It sounds like everyone's on the same page; I'm the #1 "worker's rights" advocate on the site, but unusually here, I do see some value in you "sucking it up" . . . it's a chance for you to overtly and explicitly make it clear that you're "going the extra distance" (on a minor point) since they've done a mild favor for you. Never get in a situation where "you owe them one!"
    – Fattie
    18 hours ago




    1




    1




    Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
    – Kilisi
    14 hours ago




    Number 6 makes perfect sense. And they could always do what some people do, just smile, nod, agree to do whatever, and then ignore it.
    – Kilisi
    14 hours ago












    I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
    – Dragonel
    10 hours ago




    I agree with Number 6, and where this seems now to be the case, then that is the correct answer. What insurance to get and how is of course an additional question....
    – Dragonel
    10 hours ago











    4














    Given that you already work remotely and the equipment is not already insured, you should not be required to insure this equipment just because you are going to a separate remote location.



    If the company would like their equipment insured, they should do it themselves.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
      – GroomedGorilla
      16 hours ago










    • The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
      – Andy
      8 hours ago










    • @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago
















    4














    Given that you already work remotely and the equipment is not already insured, you should not be required to insure this equipment just because you are going to a separate remote location.



    If the company would like their equipment insured, they should do it themselves.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
      – GroomedGorilla
      16 hours ago










    • The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
      – Andy
      8 hours ago










    • @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago














    4












    4








    4






    Given that you already work remotely and the equipment is not already insured, you should not be required to insure this equipment just because you are going to a separate remote location.



    If the company would like their equipment insured, they should do it themselves.






    share|improve this answer












    Given that you already work remotely and the equipment is not already insured, you should not be required to insure this equipment just because you are going to a separate remote location.



    If the company would like their equipment insured, they should do it themselves.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 16 hours ago









    sf02sf02

    3,8162519




    3,8162519








    • 2




      That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
      – GroomedGorilla
      16 hours ago










    • The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
      – Andy
      8 hours ago










    • @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago














    • 2




      That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
      – GroomedGorilla
      16 hours ago










    • The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
      – Andy
      8 hours ago










    • @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
      – Moo
      4 hours ago








    2




    2




    That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
    – GroomedGorilla
    16 hours ago




    That would be my preferred reasoning, but they're claiming their policy doesn't cover the US. I'm looking into what the added cost of adding it to my travel insurance would be. If it's not significant I think I'll "suck it up" and save the hassle of owing them anything
    – GroomedGorilla
    16 hours ago












    The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
    – Andy
    8 hours ago




    The equipment may be insured, but the policy only covers it in the uk.
    – Andy
    8 hours ago












    @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
    – Moo
    4 hours ago




    @Andy It may even go further than that - it may cover the equipment while on a business trip to the US, but this isn't a business trip...
    – Moo
    4 hours ago











    0














    If it's a work trip (i.e. they are sending you) then it's their responsibility, if it's a personal trip it's reasonable to expect the employee to cover it.






    share|improve this answer





















    • While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago








    • 1




      If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
      – Nuclear Wang
      18 hours ago










    • @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
      – Moo
      4 hours ago
















    0














    If it's a work trip (i.e. they are sending you) then it's their responsibility, if it's a personal trip it's reasonable to expect the employee to cover it.






    share|improve this answer





















    • While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago








    • 1




      If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
      – Nuclear Wang
      18 hours ago










    • @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
      – Moo
      4 hours ago














    0












    0








    0






    If it's a work trip (i.e. they are sending you) then it's their responsibility, if it's a personal trip it's reasonable to expect the employee to cover it.






    share|improve this answer












    If it's a work trip (i.e. they are sending you) then it's their responsibility, if it's a personal trip it's reasonable to expect the employee to cover it.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 18 hours ago









    motosubatsumotosubatsu

    43.7k23112174




    43.7k23112174












    • While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago








    • 1




      If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
      – Nuclear Wang
      18 hours ago










    • @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
      – Moo
      4 hours ago


















    • While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
      – Fattie
      18 hours ago








    • 1




      If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
      – Nuclear Wang
      18 hours ago










    • @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
      – Moo
      4 hours ago
















    While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
    – Fattie
    18 hours ago






    While this is 1000% reasonable, the blunt reality is programmers at the moment have all the power. One has to suck up to them all the time, and give them "red smarties," and so on. (Err, that's "red M&Ms" in the US right?) So, it's a tough one.
    – Fattie
    18 hours ago






    1




    1




    If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
    – Nuclear Wang
    18 hours ago




    If I'm taking a work laptop on a personal trip, it's because I expect to do work on it. It's work-related, so the employer should cover it.
    – Nuclear Wang
    18 hours ago












    @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
    – Moo
    4 hours ago




    @NuclearWang I disagree that it's work related - the OP is obviously trying to avoid using annual leave, so the trip itself obviously isn't work related, and the fact that they will be working on it is their own decision, not that of their employers. OP should pay for the additional insurance required. If it were an employer mandated trip, or if the employer required the op to work, then I would agree with you, but that's not the case.
    – Moo
    4 hours ago











    0














    Check with your employer if you can return your current hardware to them and they can purchase and insure a new hardware to the location you are traveling to.



    Regarding retaining your important data, you can perform backup of important things in a physical drive which is easily available and easy to carry while traveling and will be with you in case you need to use that data to setup new system. If they agree, Return the hardware as it is so they can make necessary backup procedures and also allocate it to different person.



    This will bar you from worrying from how to insure your hardware as it will be up-to your employer to decide.






    share|improve this answer


























      0














      Check with your employer if you can return your current hardware to them and they can purchase and insure a new hardware to the location you are traveling to.



      Regarding retaining your important data, you can perform backup of important things in a physical drive which is easily available and easy to carry while traveling and will be with you in case you need to use that data to setup new system. If they agree, Return the hardware as it is so they can make necessary backup procedures and also allocate it to different person.



      This will bar you from worrying from how to insure your hardware as it will be up-to your employer to decide.






      share|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        Check with your employer if you can return your current hardware to them and they can purchase and insure a new hardware to the location you are traveling to.



        Regarding retaining your important data, you can perform backup of important things in a physical drive which is easily available and easy to carry while traveling and will be with you in case you need to use that data to setup new system. If they agree, Return the hardware as it is so they can make necessary backup procedures and also allocate it to different person.



        This will bar you from worrying from how to insure your hardware as it will be up-to your employer to decide.






        share|improve this answer












        Check with your employer if you can return your current hardware to them and they can purchase and insure a new hardware to the location you are traveling to.



        Regarding retaining your important data, you can perform backup of important things in a physical drive which is easily available and easy to carry while traveling and will be with you in case you need to use that data to setup new system. If they agree, Return the hardware as it is so they can make necessary backup procedures and also allocate it to different person.



        This will bar you from worrying from how to insure your hardware as it will be up-to your employer to decide.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        nightfury101nightfury101

        1877




        1877























            -2














            The point that everyone seems to strenuously ignore is that you can only insure something that you own. So here any solution must come from the employer's insurance, not the employee. But it's OK, it would probably be cheaper anyway. and it'd only be a fairly routine extension of their existing 'stuff insurance'.



            I also disagree with the 'programmers are precious, suck it up' philosophy. The OP's employer is already being gracious about letting them roam around all over the world. There's no harm in being gracious back and offering to reimburse them for the extra cost of insurance. Why alienate people gratuitously? The programmers are precious situation could change more rapidly than you can imagine, and this kind of attitude will be remembered if a cull is needed.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 2




              "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
              – Voo
              11 hours ago










            • You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
              – Moo
              4 hours ago
















            -2














            The point that everyone seems to strenuously ignore is that you can only insure something that you own. So here any solution must come from the employer's insurance, not the employee. But it's OK, it would probably be cheaper anyway. and it'd only be a fairly routine extension of their existing 'stuff insurance'.



            I also disagree with the 'programmers are precious, suck it up' philosophy. The OP's employer is already being gracious about letting them roam around all over the world. There's no harm in being gracious back and offering to reimburse them for the extra cost of insurance. Why alienate people gratuitously? The programmers are precious situation could change more rapidly than you can imagine, and this kind of attitude will be remembered if a cull is needed.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 2




              "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
              – Voo
              11 hours ago










            • You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
              – Moo
              4 hours ago














            -2












            -2








            -2






            The point that everyone seems to strenuously ignore is that you can only insure something that you own. So here any solution must come from the employer's insurance, not the employee. But it's OK, it would probably be cheaper anyway. and it'd only be a fairly routine extension of their existing 'stuff insurance'.



            I also disagree with the 'programmers are precious, suck it up' philosophy. The OP's employer is already being gracious about letting them roam around all over the world. There's no harm in being gracious back and offering to reimburse them for the extra cost of insurance. Why alienate people gratuitously? The programmers are precious situation could change more rapidly than you can imagine, and this kind of attitude will be remembered if a cull is needed.






            share|improve this answer












            The point that everyone seems to strenuously ignore is that you can only insure something that you own. So here any solution must come from the employer's insurance, not the employee. But it's OK, it would probably be cheaper anyway. and it'd only be a fairly routine extension of their existing 'stuff insurance'.



            I also disagree with the 'programmers are precious, suck it up' philosophy. The OP's employer is already being gracious about letting them roam around all over the world. There's no harm in being gracious back and offering to reimburse them for the extra cost of insurance. Why alienate people gratuitously? The programmers are precious situation could change more rapidly than you can imagine, and this kind of attitude will be remembered if a cull is needed.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 14 hours ago









            George MGeorge M

            27717




            27717








            • 2




              "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
              – Voo
              11 hours ago










            • You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
              – Moo
              4 hours ago














            • 2




              "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
              – Voo
              11 hours ago










            • You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
              – Moo
              4 hours ago








            2




            2




            "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
            – Voo
            11 hours ago




            "you can only insure something that you own". Bill Leeper made the same claim, but clearly you can get car insurance for a rental car from many insurance companies (not just the rental agency) and Jan Fabry found insurance in Belgium for privately rented equipment. So that assumption does not seem to be based in fact. Now whether such an insurance actually exists I have no idea, but evidence suggests that it's certainly possible.
            – Voo
            11 hours ago












            You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
            – Moo
            4 hours ago




            You can trivially insure something you don't own but have responsibility for - I worked for a UK insurance broker web based insurance quote engines, and this is one of the things we sold insurance for.
            – Moo
            4 hours ago










            GroomedGorilla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            GroomedGorilla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            GroomedGorilla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            GroomedGorilla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125988%2fshould-i-be-expected-to-insure-hardware-belonging-to-my-employer-when-going-on-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown











            Popular posts from this blog

            Cosme II de Mèdici

            Hivernacle

            Eisenach