Question relating to a number theoretic function












2












$begingroup$


Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?



One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;



Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$



Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...



If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e



$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).



I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    no worries all good here
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?



One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;



Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$



Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...



If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e



$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).



I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    no worries all good here
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?



One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;



Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$



Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...



If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e



$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).



I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Question; For $a geq 2$, Let $M(a) = $ the largest prime factor of $a$ i.e $M(6) = 3, M(9) = 3, M(69) = 23$ are there infinitely many $n$ so that
$M(n-2) < M(n) < M(n+2)$ ?



One can show that for infinitely many $k$ we have $M(k-1) < M(k) < M(k+1)$ by considering the following lemma;



Lemma; If $M(y) > M(y-1),$ $exists b in mathbb{N} cup {0}$ so that $M(y^{2^b} - 1) < M(y^{2^b}) < M(y^{2^b} +1)$



Proof of Lemma; If one has $M(y-1) < M(y) < M(y+1)$ then we are done, if not then we have $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2)$, If one has $M(y^2-1) < M(y^2) < M(y^2+1)$ then we are done if not then...



If the sequence of writing above ever terminates then we have the lemma; if not then one has that $forall b$ $M(y^{2^b}) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$, i.e



$forall b$ $M(y) > M(y^{2^b}+1)$; this is absurd (I will let you think about why).



I don't think the question above can rely on this trickery.







number-theory elementary-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









acreativenameacreativename

14718




14718












  • $begingroup$
    Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    no worries all good here
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    no worries all good here
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Twin primes' conjecture implies this: if $p$ and $p+2$ are prime then $M(p-2)<M(p)<M(p+2)$.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
That conjecture is overkill, I "believe" my question is simpler.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Yes, of course, it was only a comment.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
no worries all good here
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Hint:



For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yup that solves the problem thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3205369%2fquestion-relating-to-a-number-theoretic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Hint:



For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yup that solves the problem thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago
















4












$begingroup$

Hint:



For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yup that solves the problem thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$

Hint:



For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Hint:



For every $age 2$,
$$M(2a)=M(a)$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









ajotatxeajotatxe

54.6k24090




54.6k24090












  • $begingroup$
    Yup that solves the problem thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Yup that solves the problem thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
    $endgroup$
    – ajotatxe
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – acreativename
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Yup that solves the problem thanks.
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
BTW, this idea proves also $M(n-k)<M(n)<M(n+k)$ when $k$ is a power of two or three.
$endgroup$
– ajotatxe
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
It can be extended to be proven for all $k geq 1$
$endgroup$
– acreativename
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3205369%2fquestion-relating-to-a-number-theoretic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Hivernacle

Fluorita

Hulsita