Changing the lines of the arrowhead in circuitikz












2















First of all, this is a crosspost from the german website golatex.de.
I am hoping another set of eyes on it might help find a solution.



If I draw two voltage sources with circuitikz and the second voltage source is dotted (or dashed), the arrowhead is not adjusted. It remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over".



My minimal working example illustrates the problem:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{circuitikz}
usepackage{showframe}

begin{document}

begin{circuitikz}
draw
(8,2) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_RL_qi_q$] (8,4);

draw[lightgray,dotted] %or dashed
(8,0) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] (8,2);
end{circuitikz}

end{document}


In the picture it can be seen that everything of the second voltage source can be colored but the arrowhead remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over" as mentioned above.



enter image description here



What do I have to do to get the arrowhead also dotted (or dashed)?



Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question



























    2















    First of all, this is a crosspost from the german website golatex.de.
    I am hoping another set of eyes on it might help find a solution.



    If I draw two voltage sources with circuitikz and the second voltage source is dotted (or dashed), the arrowhead is not adjusted. It remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over".



    My minimal working example illustrates the problem:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{circuitikz}
    usepackage{showframe}

    begin{document}

    begin{circuitikz}
    draw
    (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_RL_qi_q$] (8,4);

    draw[lightgray,dotted] %or dashed
    (8,0) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] (8,2);
    end{circuitikz}

    end{document}


    In the picture it can be seen that everything of the second voltage source can be colored but the arrowhead remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over" as mentioned above.



    enter image description here



    What do I have to do to get the arrowhead also dotted (or dashed)?



    Thanks in advance.










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1






      First of all, this is a crosspost from the german website golatex.de.
      I am hoping another set of eyes on it might help find a solution.



      If I draw two voltage sources with circuitikz and the second voltage source is dotted (or dashed), the arrowhead is not adjusted. It remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over".



      My minimal working example illustrates the problem:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      usepackage{showframe}

      begin{document}

      begin{circuitikz}
      draw
      (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_RL_qi_q$] (8,4);

      draw[lightgray,dotted] %or dashed
      (8,0) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] (8,2);
      end{circuitikz}

      end{document}


      In the picture it can be seen that everything of the second voltage source can be colored but the arrowhead remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over" as mentioned above.



      enter image description here



      What do I have to do to get the arrowhead also dotted (or dashed)?



      Thanks in advance.










      share|improve this question














      First of all, this is a crosspost from the german website golatex.de.
      I am hoping another set of eyes on it might help find a solution.



      If I draw two voltage sources with circuitikz and the second voltage source is dotted (or dashed), the arrowhead is not adjusted. It remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over".



      My minimal working example illustrates the problem:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      usepackage{showframe}

      begin{document}

      begin{circuitikz}
      draw
      (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_RL_qi_q$] (8,4);

      draw[lightgray,dotted] %or dashed
      (8,0) to [american voltage source, v_<=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] (8,2);
      end{circuitikz}

      end{document}


      In the picture it can be seen that everything of the second voltage source can be colored but the arrowhead remains normal and the dotted (or dashed) lines are just "drawn over" as mentioned above.



      enter image description here



      What do I have to do to get the arrowhead also dotted (or dashed)?



      Thanks in advance.







      color arrows circuitikz






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 6 hours ago









      Roland DeschainRoland Deschain

      1064




      1064






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Yes, I know. The problem is that arrows in circuitikz are not real arrows, but they are built manually with the currarrow shape. I am not sure why, but probably because circuitikz predates arrows.meta and... whatever. I plan to change it, but it is a big change, and difficult to do in a backward compatible way.



          If you change, in the definition of currarrow (file pgfcircshapes.tex, at line 308 in current git version) the command



          pgfusepath{draw,fill}


          into



          pgfusepath{fill}


          the result is a bit better (see below), but I am not sure if it can have other nasty effects around. If you want, you can open an issue on github so that I can track it...



          enter image description here



          Otherwise, you can remove the fill, but now you have a quite bad effect on the rest of the circuit:



          enter image description here



          (yes, this is the dotted version of the arrow outline. Quite bad, but the points are random, and not lined up with the corners. I really do not know how to make a dotted or dashed outline of an arrow work. densely dotted gives:



          enter image description here



          but still...)



          Notice that the standard arrows do not change with linestyle, and although you can make them unfilled, there is no provision (chapter 16.3 of the 3.0.1 TikZ manual) to make them something not solid:



          draw[-{Triangle[fill=none, ]}, densely dotted] (9,0) -- (10,0);


          enter image description here



          Stop gap solution...



          You can redefine the shape and add a bit of configurability like that:



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage[RPvoltages]{circuitikzgit}

          makeatletter

          %% Current arrow
          defarrowfilldraw{pgfusepath{draw,fill}}
          defarrowfillonly{pgfusepath{fill}}
          letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/.is choice}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/true/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/false/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfillonly}}


          pgfdeclareshape{currarrow}{
          savedanchor{northeast}{%
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x=.5pgf@circ@res@step
          pgf@y=pgf@x%
          }
          anchor{north}{northeastpgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{east}{northeastpgf@y=0cmrelax}
          anchor{south}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y pgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{west}{northeastpgf@y=0cmpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{north east}{northeast}
          anchor{north west}{northeastpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{south east}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y}
          anchor{south west}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@ypgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{center}{
          pgfpointorigin
          }
          anchor{tip}{
          pgfpointorigin
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x =pgf@circ@res@step
          }
          behindforegroundpath{
          pgfscope
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}

          pgfpathmoveto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{-.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{1pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfsetcolor{pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/color}}
          arrowuse
          endpgfscope
          }
          }

          makeatother


          begin{document}

          begin{circuitikz}
          draw
          (6,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_RL_qi_q$] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=false] ++(0,-2);
          draw (12,2) to [american current source, ] ++(0,-2);
          end{circuitikz}

          end{document}


          And you'll have



          enter image description here



          Zooming:



          enter image description here



          and if you add, for example



          defarrowstrange{pgfsetfillcolor{white}pgfusepath{fill, draw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/strange/.code={letarrowuse=arrowstrange}}


          you can also say



          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=strange] ++(0,-2);


          which will give:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • ...and no, doesn't work.

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

            – Roland Deschain
            22 mins ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488037%2fchanging-the-lines-of-the-arrowhead-in-circuitikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Yes, I know. The problem is that arrows in circuitikz are not real arrows, but they are built manually with the currarrow shape. I am not sure why, but probably because circuitikz predates arrows.meta and... whatever. I plan to change it, but it is a big change, and difficult to do in a backward compatible way.



          If you change, in the definition of currarrow (file pgfcircshapes.tex, at line 308 in current git version) the command



          pgfusepath{draw,fill}


          into



          pgfusepath{fill}


          the result is a bit better (see below), but I am not sure if it can have other nasty effects around. If you want, you can open an issue on github so that I can track it...



          enter image description here



          Otherwise, you can remove the fill, but now you have a quite bad effect on the rest of the circuit:



          enter image description here



          (yes, this is the dotted version of the arrow outline. Quite bad, but the points are random, and not lined up with the corners. I really do not know how to make a dotted or dashed outline of an arrow work. densely dotted gives:



          enter image description here



          but still...)



          Notice that the standard arrows do not change with linestyle, and although you can make them unfilled, there is no provision (chapter 16.3 of the 3.0.1 TikZ manual) to make them something not solid:



          draw[-{Triangle[fill=none, ]}, densely dotted] (9,0) -- (10,0);


          enter image description here



          Stop gap solution...



          You can redefine the shape and add a bit of configurability like that:



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage[RPvoltages]{circuitikzgit}

          makeatletter

          %% Current arrow
          defarrowfilldraw{pgfusepath{draw,fill}}
          defarrowfillonly{pgfusepath{fill}}
          letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/.is choice}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/true/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/false/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfillonly}}


          pgfdeclareshape{currarrow}{
          savedanchor{northeast}{%
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x=.5pgf@circ@res@step
          pgf@y=pgf@x%
          }
          anchor{north}{northeastpgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{east}{northeastpgf@y=0cmrelax}
          anchor{south}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y pgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{west}{northeastpgf@y=0cmpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{north east}{northeast}
          anchor{north west}{northeastpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{south east}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y}
          anchor{south west}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@ypgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{center}{
          pgfpointorigin
          }
          anchor{tip}{
          pgfpointorigin
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x =pgf@circ@res@step
          }
          behindforegroundpath{
          pgfscope
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}

          pgfpathmoveto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{-.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{1pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfsetcolor{pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/color}}
          arrowuse
          endpgfscope
          }
          }

          makeatother


          begin{document}

          begin{circuitikz}
          draw
          (6,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_RL_qi_q$] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=false] ++(0,-2);
          draw (12,2) to [american current source, ] ++(0,-2);
          end{circuitikz}

          end{document}


          And you'll have



          enter image description here



          Zooming:



          enter image description here



          and if you add, for example



          defarrowstrange{pgfsetfillcolor{white}pgfusepath{fill, draw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/strange/.code={letarrowuse=arrowstrange}}


          you can also say



          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=strange] ++(0,-2);


          which will give:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • ...and no, doesn't work.

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

            – Roland Deschain
            22 mins ago


















          3














          Yes, I know. The problem is that arrows in circuitikz are not real arrows, but they are built manually with the currarrow shape. I am not sure why, but probably because circuitikz predates arrows.meta and... whatever. I plan to change it, but it is a big change, and difficult to do in a backward compatible way.



          If you change, in the definition of currarrow (file pgfcircshapes.tex, at line 308 in current git version) the command



          pgfusepath{draw,fill}


          into



          pgfusepath{fill}


          the result is a bit better (see below), but I am not sure if it can have other nasty effects around. If you want, you can open an issue on github so that I can track it...



          enter image description here



          Otherwise, you can remove the fill, but now you have a quite bad effect on the rest of the circuit:



          enter image description here



          (yes, this is the dotted version of the arrow outline. Quite bad, but the points are random, and not lined up with the corners. I really do not know how to make a dotted or dashed outline of an arrow work. densely dotted gives:



          enter image description here



          but still...)



          Notice that the standard arrows do not change with linestyle, and although you can make them unfilled, there is no provision (chapter 16.3 of the 3.0.1 TikZ manual) to make them something not solid:



          draw[-{Triangle[fill=none, ]}, densely dotted] (9,0) -- (10,0);


          enter image description here



          Stop gap solution...



          You can redefine the shape and add a bit of configurability like that:



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage[RPvoltages]{circuitikzgit}

          makeatletter

          %% Current arrow
          defarrowfilldraw{pgfusepath{draw,fill}}
          defarrowfillonly{pgfusepath{fill}}
          letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/.is choice}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/true/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/false/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfillonly}}


          pgfdeclareshape{currarrow}{
          savedanchor{northeast}{%
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x=.5pgf@circ@res@step
          pgf@y=pgf@x%
          }
          anchor{north}{northeastpgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{east}{northeastpgf@y=0cmrelax}
          anchor{south}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y pgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{west}{northeastpgf@y=0cmpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{north east}{northeast}
          anchor{north west}{northeastpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{south east}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y}
          anchor{south west}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@ypgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{center}{
          pgfpointorigin
          }
          anchor{tip}{
          pgfpointorigin
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x =pgf@circ@res@step
          }
          behindforegroundpath{
          pgfscope
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}

          pgfpathmoveto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{-.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{1pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfsetcolor{pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/color}}
          arrowuse
          endpgfscope
          }
          }

          makeatother


          begin{document}

          begin{circuitikz}
          draw
          (6,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_RL_qi_q$] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=false] ++(0,-2);
          draw (12,2) to [american current source, ] ++(0,-2);
          end{circuitikz}

          end{document}


          And you'll have



          enter image description here



          Zooming:



          enter image description here



          and if you add, for example



          defarrowstrange{pgfsetfillcolor{white}pgfusepath{fill, draw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/strange/.code={letarrowuse=arrowstrange}}


          you can also say



          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=strange] ++(0,-2);


          which will give:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • ...and no, doesn't work.

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

            – Roland Deschain
            22 mins ago
















          3












          3








          3







          Yes, I know. The problem is that arrows in circuitikz are not real arrows, but they are built manually with the currarrow shape. I am not sure why, but probably because circuitikz predates arrows.meta and... whatever. I plan to change it, but it is a big change, and difficult to do in a backward compatible way.



          If you change, in the definition of currarrow (file pgfcircshapes.tex, at line 308 in current git version) the command



          pgfusepath{draw,fill}


          into



          pgfusepath{fill}


          the result is a bit better (see below), but I am not sure if it can have other nasty effects around. If you want, you can open an issue on github so that I can track it...



          enter image description here



          Otherwise, you can remove the fill, but now you have a quite bad effect on the rest of the circuit:



          enter image description here



          (yes, this is the dotted version of the arrow outline. Quite bad, but the points are random, and not lined up with the corners. I really do not know how to make a dotted or dashed outline of an arrow work. densely dotted gives:



          enter image description here



          but still...)



          Notice that the standard arrows do not change with linestyle, and although you can make them unfilled, there is no provision (chapter 16.3 of the 3.0.1 TikZ manual) to make them something not solid:



          draw[-{Triangle[fill=none, ]}, densely dotted] (9,0) -- (10,0);


          enter image description here



          Stop gap solution...



          You can redefine the shape and add a bit of configurability like that:



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage[RPvoltages]{circuitikzgit}

          makeatletter

          %% Current arrow
          defarrowfilldraw{pgfusepath{draw,fill}}
          defarrowfillonly{pgfusepath{fill}}
          letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/.is choice}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/true/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/false/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfillonly}}


          pgfdeclareshape{currarrow}{
          savedanchor{northeast}{%
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x=.5pgf@circ@res@step
          pgf@y=pgf@x%
          }
          anchor{north}{northeastpgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{east}{northeastpgf@y=0cmrelax}
          anchor{south}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y pgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{west}{northeastpgf@y=0cmpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{north east}{northeast}
          anchor{north west}{northeastpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{south east}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y}
          anchor{south west}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@ypgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{center}{
          pgfpointorigin
          }
          anchor{tip}{
          pgfpointorigin
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x =pgf@circ@res@step
          }
          behindforegroundpath{
          pgfscope
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}

          pgfpathmoveto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{-.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{1pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfsetcolor{pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/color}}
          arrowuse
          endpgfscope
          }
          }

          makeatother


          begin{document}

          begin{circuitikz}
          draw
          (6,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_RL_qi_q$] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=false] ++(0,-2);
          draw (12,2) to [american current source, ] ++(0,-2);
          end{circuitikz}

          end{document}


          And you'll have



          enter image description here



          Zooming:



          enter image description here



          and if you add, for example



          defarrowstrange{pgfsetfillcolor{white}pgfusepath{fill, draw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/strange/.code={letarrowuse=arrowstrange}}


          you can also say



          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=strange] ++(0,-2);


          which will give:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          Yes, I know. The problem is that arrows in circuitikz are not real arrows, but they are built manually with the currarrow shape. I am not sure why, but probably because circuitikz predates arrows.meta and... whatever. I plan to change it, but it is a big change, and difficult to do in a backward compatible way.



          If you change, in the definition of currarrow (file pgfcircshapes.tex, at line 308 in current git version) the command



          pgfusepath{draw,fill}


          into



          pgfusepath{fill}


          the result is a bit better (see below), but I am not sure if it can have other nasty effects around. If you want, you can open an issue on github so that I can track it...



          enter image description here



          Otherwise, you can remove the fill, but now you have a quite bad effect on the rest of the circuit:



          enter image description here



          (yes, this is the dotted version of the arrow outline. Quite bad, but the points are random, and not lined up with the corners. I really do not know how to make a dotted or dashed outline of an arrow work. densely dotted gives:



          enter image description here



          but still...)



          Notice that the standard arrows do not change with linestyle, and although you can make them unfilled, there is no provision (chapter 16.3 of the 3.0.1 TikZ manual) to make them something not solid:



          draw[-{Triangle[fill=none, ]}, densely dotted] (9,0) -- (10,0);


          enter image description here



          Stop gap solution...



          You can redefine the shape and add a bit of configurability like that:



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage[RPvoltages]{circuitikzgit}

          makeatletter

          %% Current arrow
          defarrowfilldraw{pgfusepath{draw,fill}}
          defarrowfillonly{pgfusepath{fill}}
          letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/.is choice}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/true/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfilldraw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/false/.code={letarrowuse=arrowfillonly}}


          pgfdeclareshape{currarrow}{
          savedanchor{northeast}{%
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x=.5pgf@circ@res@step
          pgf@y=pgf@x%
          }
          anchor{north}{northeastpgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{east}{northeastpgf@y=0cmrelax}
          anchor{south}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y pgf@x=0cmrelax}
          anchor{west}{northeastpgf@y=0cmpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{north east}{northeast}
          anchor{north west}{northeastpgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{south east}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@y}
          anchor{south west}{northeastpgf@y=-pgf@ypgf@x=-pgf@x}
          anchor{center}{
          pgfpointorigin
          }
          anchor{tip}{
          pgfpointorigin
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}
          pgf@x =pgf@circ@res@step
          }
          behindforegroundpath{
          pgfscope
          pgf@circ@res@step = pgf@circ@Rlen
          divide pgf@circ@res@step by pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/current arrow scale}

          pgfpathmoveto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{-.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{1pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{.8pgf@circ@res@step}}
          pgfpathlineto{pgfpoint{-.7pgf@circ@res@step}{0pt}}
          pgfsetcolor{pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/circuitikz/color}}
          arrowuse
          endpgfscope
          }
          }

          makeatother


          begin{document}

          begin{circuitikz}
          draw
          (6,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_RL_qi_q$] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (8,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray] ++(0,-2);
          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=false] ++(0,-2);
          draw (12,2) to [american current source, ] ++(0,-2);
          end{circuitikz}

          end{document}


          And you'll have



          enter image description here



          Zooming:



          enter image description here



          and if you add, for example



          defarrowstrange{pgfsetfillcolor{white}pgfusepath{fill, draw}}
          tikzset{ctikzarrdraw/strange/.code={letarrowuse=arrowstrange}}


          you can also say



          draw[color=lightgray, densely dotted] %or dashed
          (10,2) to [american voltage source, v_=$omega_Rpsi$,color=lightgray, ctikzarrdraw=strange] ++(0,-2);


          which will give:



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 5 hours ago









          RmanoRmano

          8,43621649




          8,43621649













          • Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • ...and no, doesn't work.

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

            – Roland Deschain
            22 mins ago





















          • Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • ...and no, doesn't work.

            – Rmano
            4 hours ago











          • Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

            – Roland Deschain
            22 mins ago



















          Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

          – Rmano
          4 hours ago





          Ok, I checked. I can't change the fill,draw to fill, because the tip anchor will be misplaced by the line width, which is variable, which is a problem. Maybe using deferredanchor...

          – Rmano
          4 hours ago













          ...and no, doesn't work.

          – Rmano
          4 hours ago





          ...and no, doesn't work.

          – Rmano
          4 hours ago













          Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

          – Roland Deschain
          22 mins ago







          Your last answer with the unfilled arrowhead it's what I've been looking for. Unfortunately I have to use circuitikzgit and add some additional code before the preamble because currently I don't know, if the rest of my code is still functionally.

          – Roland Deschain
          22 mins ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488037%2fchanging-the-lines-of-the-arrowhead-in-circuitikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Hivernacle

          Fluorita

          Hulsita