Python: pythonic way to find last position in string that does not match regex





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







6















In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.










share|improve this question

























  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    1 hour ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago




















6















In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.










share|improve this question

























  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    1 hour ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago
















6












6








6


1






In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.










share|improve this question
















In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.







python regex string regex-negation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







geekoverdose

















asked 2 hours ago









geekoverdosegeekoverdose

727615




727615













  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    1 hour ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago





















  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    1 hour ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago



















last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

– dgumo
1 hour ago





last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

– dgumo
1 hour ago













Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago





Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago













Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

– ruohola
1 hour ago







Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

– ruohola
1 hour ago






1




1





With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago







With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago














3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)



Output:



8






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago



















2














You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    5 mins ago



















0














This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @Benj how does this reverse the string?

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55890245%2fpython-pythonic-way-to-find-last-position-in-string-that-does-not-match-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)



Output:



8






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago
















4














This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)



Output:



8






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago














4












4








4







This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)



Output:



8






share|improve this answer















This is a really pythonic way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)



Output:



8







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









ruoholaruohola

2,129424




2,129424








  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago














  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    33 mins ago








1




1





This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago





This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago













Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago





Is there a one-liner solution to this? Python's iterators are not subscriptable, which prevents a [-1] index access in your solution. That I need a temporary variable and two lines of code as a result is a downside for me.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago













The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

– Right leg
1 hour ago





The second "solution" stores the intermediate results in memory, which is certainly not something that you want as a tradeoff with a oneliner

– Right leg
1 hour ago




1




1





@Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

– ruohola
33 mins ago





@Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

– ruohola
33 mins ago













@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

– ruohola
33 mins ago





@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

– ruohola
33 mins ago













2














You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    5 mins ago
















2














You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    5 mins ago














2












2








2







You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8





share|improve this answer















You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Pushpesh Kumar RajwanshiPushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi

13.7k21331




13.7k21331








  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    5 mins ago














  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    5 mins ago








1




1





Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

– ruohola
1 hour ago







Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

– ruohola
1 hour ago















@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago





@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
1 hour ago




1




1





Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago





Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago













This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

– ruohola
5 mins ago





This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

– ruohola
5 mins ago











0














This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @Benj how does this reverse the string?

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago


















0














This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @Benj how does this reverse the string?

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago
















0












0








0







This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer













This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









Right legRight leg

8,70442450




8,70442450








  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @Benj how does this reverse the string?

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago
















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    1 hour ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @Benj how does this reverse the string?

    – Right leg
    1 hour ago










2




2





This is just not pythonic at all.

– ruohola
1 hour ago





This is just not pythonic at all.

– ruohola
1 hour ago













I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago







I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

– geekoverdose
1 hour ago















@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

– Right leg
1 hour ago





@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

– Right leg
1 hour ago




1




1





This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

– ruohola
1 hour ago





This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

– ruohola
1 hour ago













@Benj how does this reverse the string?

– Right leg
1 hour ago







@Benj how does this reverse the string?

– Right leg
1 hour ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55890245%2fpython-pythonic-way-to-find-last-position-in-string-that-does-not-match-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Hivernacle

Fluorita

Hulsita