why isn't “a single + noun” a tautological repeat?
By definition,
single means
(1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion
(2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many
(3) : consisting of only one in number
by Merriam-Webster
So why do we still say
"a single rose"
"hold to a single ideal"
Not
"single rose"
"hold to single ideal"
word-usage
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
add a comment |
By definition,
single means
(1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion
(2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many
(3) : consisting of only one in number
by Merriam-Webster
So why do we still say
"a single rose"
"hold to a single ideal"
Not
"single rose"
"hold to single ideal"
word-usage
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
add a comment |
By definition,
single means
(1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion
(2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many
(3) : consisting of only one in number
by Merriam-Webster
So why do we still say
"a single rose"
"hold to a single ideal"
Not
"single rose"
"hold to single ideal"
word-usage
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
By definition,
single means
(1) : consisting of or having only one part, feature, or portion
(2) : consisting of one as opposed to or in contrast with many
(3) : consisting of only one in number
by Merriam-Webster
So why do we still say
"a single rose"
"hold to a single ideal"
Not
"single rose"
"hold to single ideal"
word-usage
word-usage
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
asked 2 hours ago
B ChenB Chen
2771211
2771211
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Repetition can be used for emphasis.
The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].
Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
add a comment |
Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.
Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)
The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.
It makes the difference between statements such as:
a pupil raised her hand
and
a single pupil raised her hand.
The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.
The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192464%2fwhy-isnt-a-single-noun-a-tautological-repeat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Repetition can be used for emphasis.
The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].
Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
add a comment |
Repetition can be used for emphasis.
The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].
Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
add a comment |
Repetition can be used for emphasis.
The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].
Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
Repetition can be used for emphasis.
The indefinite article "a" does imply that there is only one [thing](otherwise you would normally use no article and a plural noun). So maybe you could say "single" is redundant in some sentences. But people do use it for emphasis when they want to make an explicit point that there is only one [thing].
Perhaps the word "single" could be left out in some situations, but the article "a" is a feature of the language, and you can't leave that word out (as you seem to suggest.) If you feel "a single" is repetitive, then leave out the "single". The "a" isn't optional.
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
answered 1 hour ago
Lorel C.Lorel C.
1,20535
1,20535
add a comment |
add a comment |
Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.
Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)
The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.
It makes the difference between statements such as:
a pupil raised her hand
and
a single pupil raised her hand.
The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.
The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
add a comment |
Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.
Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)
The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.
It makes the difference between statements such as:
a pupil raised her hand
and
a single pupil raised her hand.
The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.
The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
add a comment |
Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.
Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)
The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.
It makes the difference between statements such as:
a pupil raised her hand
and
a single pupil raised her hand.
The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.
The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
Single serves the same role here that any other adjective would do, whether we are talking about a single rose, a solitary rose, a red rose or any other rose.
Introducing an adjective to qualify the rose does not change the need for the article a (or the)
The role of single is to emphasise that there are no other roses, not to replace the article.
It makes the difference between statements such as:
a pupil raised her hand
and
a single pupil raised her hand.
The adjective changes the nuance. The emphasis moves from the raising of the hand to the fact that only a single pupil does so. The same is true for saying a rose stood in the vase and a single rose stood in the vase.
The same rule applies regardless of whether you are talking about a rose, an ideal or any other noun.
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
answered 1 hour ago
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
9,89611019
9,89611019
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192464%2fwhy-isnt-a-single-noun-a-tautological-repeat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
