Prove that the product of any two numbers between two consecutive squares is never a perfect square
$begingroup$
In essence, I want to prove that the product of any two distinct elements in the set ${n^2, n^2+1, ... , (n+1)^2-1}$ is never a perfect square for a positive integers $n$. I have no idea on how to prove it, but I've also yet to find a counterexample to this statement. Can anyone help?
number-theory elementary-number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In essence, I want to prove that the product of any two distinct elements in the set ${n^2, n^2+1, ... , (n+1)^2-1}$ is never a perfect square for a positive integers $n$. I have no idea on how to prove it, but I've also yet to find a counterexample to this statement. Can anyone help?
number-theory elementary-number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
just inequalities. All positive integers, can we have $n^2 < 2 w^2 < 2 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$ How about $n^2 < 3 w^2 < 3 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
is $n^2$ included in the set? If so, why is $(n+1)^2$ not included?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva Because then the statement is obviously false, with (n(n+1))^2
$endgroup$
– gnasher729
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In essence, I want to prove that the product of any two distinct elements in the set ${n^2, n^2+1, ... , (n+1)^2-1}$ is never a perfect square for a positive integers $n$. I have no idea on how to prove it, but I've also yet to find a counterexample to this statement. Can anyone help?
number-theory elementary-number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
In essence, I want to prove that the product of any two distinct elements in the set ${n^2, n^2+1, ... , (n+1)^2-1}$ is never a perfect square for a positive integers $n$. I have no idea on how to prove it, but I've also yet to find a counterexample to this statement. Can anyone help?
number-theory elementary-number-theory
number-theory elementary-number-theory
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 10 hours ago
Ed TEd T
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
just inequalities. All positive integers, can we have $n^2 < 2 w^2 < 2 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$ How about $n^2 < 3 w^2 < 3 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
is $n^2$ included in the set? If so, why is $(n+1)^2$ not included?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva Because then the statement is obviously false, with (n(n+1))^2
$endgroup$
– gnasher729
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
just inequalities. All positive integers, can we have $n^2 < 2 w^2 < 2 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$ How about $n^2 < 3 w^2 < 3 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
is $n^2$ included in the set? If so, why is $(n+1)^2$ not included?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva Because then the statement is obviously false, with (n(n+1))^2
$endgroup$
– gnasher729
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
just inequalities. All positive integers, can we have $n^2 < 2 w^2 < 2 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$ How about $n^2 < 3 w^2 < 3 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
just inequalities. All positive integers, can we have $n^2 < 2 w^2 < 2 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$ How about $n^2 < 3 w^2 < 3 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
is $n^2$ included in the set? If so, why is $(n+1)^2$ not included?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
is $n^2$ included in the set? If so, why is $(n+1)^2$ not included?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
9 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva Because then the statement is obviously false, with (n(n+1))^2
$endgroup$
– gnasher729
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva Because then the statement is obviously false, with (n(n+1))^2
$endgroup$
– gnasher729
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, note that $n^2$ can't be one of the elements as the other element would also need to be a perfect square for the product to be a perfect square. As gnasher729 commented to the answer, this is why $left(n + 1right)^2$ is not included.
Assume there are $2$ such elements, $n^2 + a$ and $n^2 + b$, with $a neq b$, $1 le a, b le 2n$ and, WLOG, $a lt b$. Thus, consider their product to be a perfect square of some integer $p$, i.e.,
$$left(n^2 + aright)left(n^2 + bright) = p^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
As $n^2 + a lt p lt n^2 + b$, let
$$p = n^2 + c tag{2}label{eq2}$$
for some $a lt c lt b$. Thus, for some positive integers $d$ and $e$, we have that
$$a = c - d tag{3}label{eq3}$$
$$b = c + e tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Substitute eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq3} and eqref{eq4} into eqref{eq1} to get
$$left(n^2 + left(c - dright)right)left(n^2 + left(c + eright)right) = left(n^2 + cright)^2 tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Expanding both sides gives
$$n^4 + 2cn^2 + left(e - dright)n^2 + c^2 + cleft(e - dright) - ed = n^4 + 2cn^2 + c^2 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Removing the common terms on both sides and moving the remaining terms, apart from the $n^2$ one, to the right gives
$$left(e - dright)n^2 = -cleft(e - dright) + ed tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Note that $e le d$ won't work because the LHS would be become non-positive but the RHS would become positive. Thus, consider $e gt d$, i.e., let
$$e = d + m, text{ with } m ge 1 tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus,
$$e + d lt 2n Rightarrow 2d + m lt 2n Rightarrow d lt n - frac{m}{2} tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Also,
$$ed = left(d + mright)d lt left(n + frac{m}{2}right)left(n - frac{m}{2}right) = n^2 - frac{m^2}{4} lt n^2 tag{10}label{eq10}$$
As such, the RHS of eqref{eq7} is $lt n^2$, so it can't be true.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For any two numbers $n^2+a, n^2+b; 0<a<b<(2n+1)$, their product will satisfy $n^4<n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab<(n^2+2n+1)^2$.
All of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ will have the form $(n^2+m)^2=n^4+2mn^2+m^2; 1le mle 2n$
If $n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab$ is a perfect square, it will be one of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ and hence equal to $n^4+2mn^2+m^2$ for some $m$.
Thus $(a+b)=2m; ab=m^2$ for some $m$
Rearranging, we get $m^2=frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}=ab=frac{4ab}{4}$, or $a^2+b^2=2ab$.
This implies both $amid b$ and $bmid a$, meaning $b=a$ and the numbers being multiplied to obtain a perfect square are not distinct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Ed T is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3116686%2fprove-that-the-product-of-any-two-numbers-between-two-consecutive-squares-is-nev%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, note that $n^2$ can't be one of the elements as the other element would also need to be a perfect square for the product to be a perfect square. As gnasher729 commented to the answer, this is why $left(n + 1right)^2$ is not included.
Assume there are $2$ such elements, $n^2 + a$ and $n^2 + b$, with $a neq b$, $1 le a, b le 2n$ and, WLOG, $a lt b$. Thus, consider their product to be a perfect square of some integer $p$, i.e.,
$$left(n^2 + aright)left(n^2 + bright) = p^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
As $n^2 + a lt p lt n^2 + b$, let
$$p = n^2 + c tag{2}label{eq2}$$
for some $a lt c lt b$. Thus, for some positive integers $d$ and $e$, we have that
$$a = c - d tag{3}label{eq3}$$
$$b = c + e tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Substitute eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq3} and eqref{eq4} into eqref{eq1} to get
$$left(n^2 + left(c - dright)right)left(n^2 + left(c + eright)right) = left(n^2 + cright)^2 tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Expanding both sides gives
$$n^4 + 2cn^2 + left(e - dright)n^2 + c^2 + cleft(e - dright) - ed = n^4 + 2cn^2 + c^2 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Removing the common terms on both sides and moving the remaining terms, apart from the $n^2$ one, to the right gives
$$left(e - dright)n^2 = -cleft(e - dright) + ed tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Note that $e le d$ won't work because the LHS would be become non-positive but the RHS would become positive. Thus, consider $e gt d$, i.e., let
$$e = d + m, text{ with } m ge 1 tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus,
$$e + d lt 2n Rightarrow 2d + m lt 2n Rightarrow d lt n - frac{m}{2} tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Also,
$$ed = left(d + mright)d lt left(n + frac{m}{2}right)left(n - frac{m}{2}right) = n^2 - frac{m^2}{4} lt n^2 tag{10}label{eq10}$$
As such, the RHS of eqref{eq7} is $lt n^2$, so it can't be true.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, note that $n^2$ can't be one of the elements as the other element would also need to be a perfect square for the product to be a perfect square. As gnasher729 commented to the answer, this is why $left(n + 1right)^2$ is not included.
Assume there are $2$ such elements, $n^2 + a$ and $n^2 + b$, with $a neq b$, $1 le a, b le 2n$ and, WLOG, $a lt b$. Thus, consider their product to be a perfect square of some integer $p$, i.e.,
$$left(n^2 + aright)left(n^2 + bright) = p^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
As $n^2 + a lt p lt n^2 + b$, let
$$p = n^2 + c tag{2}label{eq2}$$
for some $a lt c lt b$. Thus, for some positive integers $d$ and $e$, we have that
$$a = c - d tag{3}label{eq3}$$
$$b = c + e tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Substitute eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq3} and eqref{eq4} into eqref{eq1} to get
$$left(n^2 + left(c - dright)right)left(n^2 + left(c + eright)right) = left(n^2 + cright)^2 tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Expanding both sides gives
$$n^4 + 2cn^2 + left(e - dright)n^2 + c^2 + cleft(e - dright) - ed = n^4 + 2cn^2 + c^2 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Removing the common terms on both sides and moving the remaining terms, apart from the $n^2$ one, to the right gives
$$left(e - dright)n^2 = -cleft(e - dright) + ed tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Note that $e le d$ won't work because the LHS would be become non-positive but the RHS would become positive. Thus, consider $e gt d$, i.e., let
$$e = d + m, text{ with } m ge 1 tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus,
$$e + d lt 2n Rightarrow 2d + m lt 2n Rightarrow d lt n - frac{m}{2} tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Also,
$$ed = left(d + mright)d lt left(n + frac{m}{2}right)left(n - frac{m}{2}right) = n^2 - frac{m^2}{4} lt n^2 tag{10}label{eq10}$$
As such, the RHS of eqref{eq7} is $lt n^2$, so it can't be true.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, note that $n^2$ can't be one of the elements as the other element would also need to be a perfect square for the product to be a perfect square. As gnasher729 commented to the answer, this is why $left(n + 1right)^2$ is not included.
Assume there are $2$ such elements, $n^2 + a$ and $n^2 + b$, with $a neq b$, $1 le a, b le 2n$ and, WLOG, $a lt b$. Thus, consider their product to be a perfect square of some integer $p$, i.e.,
$$left(n^2 + aright)left(n^2 + bright) = p^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
As $n^2 + a lt p lt n^2 + b$, let
$$p = n^2 + c tag{2}label{eq2}$$
for some $a lt c lt b$. Thus, for some positive integers $d$ and $e$, we have that
$$a = c - d tag{3}label{eq3}$$
$$b = c + e tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Substitute eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq3} and eqref{eq4} into eqref{eq1} to get
$$left(n^2 + left(c - dright)right)left(n^2 + left(c + eright)right) = left(n^2 + cright)^2 tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Expanding both sides gives
$$n^4 + 2cn^2 + left(e - dright)n^2 + c^2 + cleft(e - dright) - ed = n^4 + 2cn^2 + c^2 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Removing the common terms on both sides and moving the remaining terms, apart from the $n^2$ one, to the right gives
$$left(e - dright)n^2 = -cleft(e - dright) + ed tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Note that $e le d$ won't work because the LHS would be become non-positive but the RHS would become positive. Thus, consider $e gt d$, i.e., let
$$e = d + m, text{ with } m ge 1 tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus,
$$e + d lt 2n Rightarrow 2d + m lt 2n Rightarrow d lt n - frac{m}{2} tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Also,
$$ed = left(d + mright)d lt left(n + frac{m}{2}right)left(n - frac{m}{2}right) = n^2 - frac{m^2}{4} lt n^2 tag{10}label{eq10}$$
As such, the RHS of eqref{eq7} is $lt n^2$, so it can't be true.
$endgroup$
First, note that $n^2$ can't be one of the elements as the other element would also need to be a perfect square for the product to be a perfect square. As gnasher729 commented to the answer, this is why $left(n + 1right)^2$ is not included.
Assume there are $2$ such elements, $n^2 + a$ and $n^2 + b$, with $a neq b$, $1 le a, b le 2n$ and, WLOG, $a lt b$. Thus, consider their product to be a perfect square of some integer $p$, i.e.,
$$left(n^2 + aright)left(n^2 + bright) = p^2 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
As $n^2 + a lt p lt n^2 + b$, let
$$p = n^2 + c tag{2}label{eq2}$$
for some $a lt c lt b$. Thus, for some positive integers $d$ and $e$, we have that
$$a = c - d tag{3}label{eq3}$$
$$b = c + e tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Substitute eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq3} and eqref{eq4} into eqref{eq1} to get
$$left(n^2 + left(c - dright)right)left(n^2 + left(c + eright)right) = left(n^2 + cright)^2 tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Expanding both sides gives
$$n^4 + 2cn^2 + left(e - dright)n^2 + c^2 + cleft(e - dright) - ed = n^4 + 2cn^2 + c^2 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Removing the common terms on both sides and moving the remaining terms, apart from the $n^2$ one, to the right gives
$$left(e - dright)n^2 = -cleft(e - dright) + ed tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Note that $e le d$ won't work because the LHS would be become non-positive but the RHS would become positive. Thus, consider $e gt d$, i.e., let
$$e = d + m, text{ with } m ge 1 tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus,
$$e + d lt 2n Rightarrow 2d + m lt 2n Rightarrow d lt n - frac{m}{2} tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Also,
$$ed = left(d + mright)d lt left(n + frac{m}{2}right)left(n - frac{m}{2}right) = n^2 - frac{m^2}{4} lt n^2 tag{10}label{eq10}$$
As such, the RHS of eqref{eq7} is $lt n^2$, so it can't be true.
answered 8 hours ago
John OmielanJohn Omielan
2,864212
2,864212
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For any two numbers $n^2+a, n^2+b; 0<a<b<(2n+1)$, their product will satisfy $n^4<n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab<(n^2+2n+1)^2$.
All of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ will have the form $(n^2+m)^2=n^4+2mn^2+m^2; 1le mle 2n$
If $n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab$ is a perfect square, it will be one of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ and hence equal to $n^4+2mn^2+m^2$ for some $m$.
Thus $(a+b)=2m; ab=m^2$ for some $m$
Rearranging, we get $m^2=frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}=ab=frac{4ab}{4}$, or $a^2+b^2=2ab$.
This implies both $amid b$ and $bmid a$, meaning $b=a$ and the numbers being multiplied to obtain a perfect square are not distinct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For any two numbers $n^2+a, n^2+b; 0<a<b<(2n+1)$, their product will satisfy $n^4<n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab<(n^2+2n+1)^2$.
All of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ will have the form $(n^2+m)^2=n^4+2mn^2+m^2; 1le mle 2n$
If $n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab$ is a perfect square, it will be one of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ and hence equal to $n^4+2mn^2+m^2$ for some $m$.
Thus $(a+b)=2m; ab=m^2$ for some $m$
Rearranging, we get $m^2=frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}=ab=frac{4ab}{4}$, or $a^2+b^2=2ab$.
This implies both $amid b$ and $bmid a$, meaning $b=a$ and the numbers being multiplied to obtain a perfect square are not distinct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For any two numbers $n^2+a, n^2+b; 0<a<b<(2n+1)$, their product will satisfy $n^4<n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab<(n^2+2n+1)^2$.
All of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ will have the form $(n^2+m)^2=n^4+2mn^2+m^2; 1le mle 2n$
If $n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab$ is a perfect square, it will be one of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ and hence equal to $n^4+2mn^2+m^2$ for some $m$.
Thus $(a+b)=2m; ab=m^2$ for some $m$
Rearranging, we get $m^2=frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}=ab=frac{4ab}{4}$, or $a^2+b^2=2ab$.
This implies both $amid b$ and $bmid a$, meaning $b=a$ and the numbers being multiplied to obtain a perfect square are not distinct.
$endgroup$
For any two numbers $n^2+a, n^2+b; 0<a<b<(2n+1)$, their product will satisfy $n^4<n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab<(n^2+2n+1)^2$.
All of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ will have the form $(n^2+m)^2=n^4+2mn^2+m^2; 1le mle 2n$
If $n^4+(a+b)n^2+ab$ is a perfect square, it will be one of the squares between $n^4$ and $(n^2+2n+1)^2$ and hence equal to $n^4+2mn^2+m^2$ for some $m$.
Thus $(a+b)=2m; ab=m^2$ for some $m$
Rearranging, we get $m^2=frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}=ab=frac{4ab}{4}$, or $a^2+b^2=2ab$.
This implies both $amid b$ and $bmid a$, meaning $b=a$ and the numbers being multiplied to obtain a perfect square are not distinct.
answered 8 hours ago
Keith BackmanKeith Backman
1,3681812
1,3681812
1
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Simpler: if $a+2+b^2 = 2ab$ then $(a-b)^2 = 0$ so $a = b$. Nice answer.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Note that $n$ is a fixed value. How do you know that, for example, $a + b = 2m - 1$ and $ab = n^2 + m^2$ can't be true instead? It might be intuitively obvious to you, & others, but it's not to me. This is why I try to explicitly show this doesn't occur in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Ed T is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ed T is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ed T is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ed T is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3116686%2fprove-that-the-product-of-any-two-numbers-between-two-consecutive-squares-is-nev%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
just inequalities. All positive integers, can we have $n^2 < 2 w^2 < 2 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$ How about $n^2 < 3 w^2 < 3 (w+1)^2 < (n+1)^2 ; ; ? ; ;$
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
is $n^2$ included in the set? If so, why is $(n+1)^2$ not included?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva Because then the statement is obviously false, with (n(n+1))^2
$endgroup$
– gnasher729
9 hours ago