Construct a nonabelian group of order 44
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbb{Z_{11}})cong(mathbb{Z_{10}},+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde{5}inmathbb{Z_{10}}$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^{11} prp^{-1}=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbb{Z_{11}}$ with the additive group of $mathbb{Z_{10}}$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbb{Z_{10}}$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbb{Z_{11}})$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^{11}=1 , prp^{-1}=r^{10} rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbb{Z_{11}})cong(mathbb{Z_{10}},+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde{5}inmathbb{Z_{10}}$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^{11} prp^{-1}=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbb{Z_{11}}$ with the additive group of $mathbb{Z_{10}}$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbb{Z_{10}}$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbb{Z_{11}})$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^{11}=1 , prp^{-1}=r^{10} rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^{11}$ (r^{11}), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_{10}$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde{5} in mathbb{Z}_{10}$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbb{Z_{11}})cong(mathbb{Z_{10}},+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde{5}inmathbb{Z_{10}}$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^{11} prp^{-1}=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbb{Z_{11}}$ with the additive group of $mathbb{Z_{10}}$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbb{Z_{10}}$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbb{Z_{11}})$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^{11}=1 , prp^{-1}=r^{10} rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbb{Z_{11}})cong(mathbb{Z_{10}},+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde{5}inmathbb{Z_{10}}$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^{11} prp^{-1}=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbb{Z_{11}}$ with the additive group of $mathbb{Z_{10}}$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbb{Z_{10}}$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbb{Z_{11}})$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^{11}=1 , prp^{-1}=r^{10} rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
edited 3 hours ago
Travis
64.6k769152
64.6k769152
asked 5 hours ago
Mathematical MushroomMathematical Mushroom
22418
22418
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^{11}$ (r^{11}), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_{10}$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde{5} in mathbb{Z}_{10}$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^{11}$ (r^{11}), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_{10}$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde{5} in mathbb{Z}_{10}$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^{11}$ (r^{11}), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^{11}$ (r^{11}), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_{10}$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_{10}$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde{5} in mathbb{Z}_{10}$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde{5} in mathbb{Z}_{10}$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_{10}$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_{10}$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_{11}^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_{11}timesmathbb{Z}_4$, $mathbb Z_{11}times mathbb{Z}_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbb{Z}_{11} rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^{11}, b^4, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1}rangle$ and $mathbb Z_{11}rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^{11}, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^{-1}ab = c^{-1}ac = a^{-1} rangle$. I think the latter is $D_{22}$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$ are $operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}}$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11})$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_{44} .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_{11} rtimes_{gamma} Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_{44} cong D_{22} times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3197658%2fconstruct-a-nonabelian-group-of-order-44%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_{10}$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_{10}$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_{11}^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_{11}timesmathbb{Z}_4$, $mathbb Z_{11}times mathbb{Z}_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbb{Z}_{11} rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^{11}, b^4, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1}rangle$ and $mathbb Z_{11}rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^{11}, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^{-1}ab = c^{-1}ac = a^{-1} rangle$. I think the latter is $D_{22}$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_{10}$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_{10}$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_{11}^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_{11}timesmathbb{Z}_4$, $mathbb Z_{11}times mathbb{Z}_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbb{Z}_{11} rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^{11}, b^4, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1}rangle$ and $mathbb Z_{11}rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^{11}, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^{-1}ab = c^{-1}ac = a^{-1} rangle$. I think the latter is $D_{22}$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_{10}$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_{10}$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_{11}^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_{11}timesmathbb{Z}_4$, $mathbb Z_{11}times mathbb{Z}_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbb{Z}_{11} rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^{11}, b^4, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1}rangle$ and $mathbb Z_{11}rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^{11}, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^{-1}ab = c^{-1}ac = a^{-1} rangle$. I think the latter is $D_{22}$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_{10}$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_{10}$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_{11}^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_{11}timesmathbb{Z}_4$, $mathbb Z_{11}times mathbb{Z}_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbb{Z}_{11} rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^{11}, b^4, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1}rangle$ and $mathbb Z_{11}rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^{11}, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^{-1}ab = c^{-1}ac = a^{-1} rangle$. I think the latter is $D_{22}$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Rylee LymanRylee Lyman
646211
646211
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$ are $operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}}$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11})$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_{44} .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_{11} rtimes_{gamma} Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_{44} cong D_{22} times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$ are $operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}}$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11})$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_{44} .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_{11} rtimes_{gamma} Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_{44} cong D_{22} times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$ are $operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}}$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11})$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_{44} .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_{11} rtimes_{gamma} Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_{44} cong D_{22} times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11}) cong (Bbb Z_{10}, +)$ are $operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}} leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatorname{id}_{Bbb Z_{11}}$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatorname{Aut}(Bbb Z_{11})$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_{44} .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_{11} rtimes_{gamma} Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_{11} times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_{44} cong D_{22} times Bbb Z_2$.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
TravisTravis
64.6k769152
64.6k769152
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3197658%2fconstruct-a-nonabelian-group-of-order-44%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^{11}$ (r^{11}), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_{10}$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde{5} in mathbb{Z}_{10}$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago