How do I test for when someone kills all of the zombies in an area?
I have been trying to make a minecraft map in windows 10 edition but I can't get the setbock command to work if all of the mobs in the area have been killed.
minecraft minecraft-commands minecraft-windows-10
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I have been trying to make a minecraft map in windows 10 edition but I can't get the setbock command to work if all of the mobs in the area have been killed.
minecraft minecraft-commands minecraft-windows-10
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
What do you mean all the mobs in an "area"? Could you test and see if there are no zombies in a radius from a block and then run commands, or do you have to test something else?
– SpiceWeasel
Jan 6 at 20:42
add a comment |
I have been trying to make a minecraft map in windows 10 edition but I can't get the setbock command to work if all of the mobs in the area have been killed.
minecraft minecraft-commands minecraft-windows-10
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
I have been trying to make a minecraft map in windows 10 edition but I can't get the setbock command to work if all of the mobs in the area have been killed.
minecraft minecraft-commands minecraft-windows-10
minecraft minecraft-commands minecraft-windows-10
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
asked Jan 6 at 15:00
joejoe
6
6
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
What do you mean all the mobs in an "area"? Could you test and see if there are no zombies in a radius from a block and then run commands, or do you have to test something else?
– SpiceWeasel
Jan 6 at 20:42
add a comment |
2
What do you mean all the mobs in an "area"? Could you test and see if there are no zombies in a radius from a block and then run commands, or do you have to test something else?
– SpiceWeasel
Jan 6 at 20:42
2
2
What do you mean all the mobs in an "area"? Could you test and see if there are no zombies in a radius from a block and then run commands, or do you have to test something else?
– SpiceWeasel
Jan 6 at 20:42
What do you mean all the mobs in an "area"? Could you test and see if there are no zombies in a radius from a block and then run commands, or do you have to test something else?
– SpiceWeasel
Jan 6 at 20:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
A solution I found is that you can do a command testfor this will test for entities:
/testfor @e[type=zombie]
This will test for all currently loaded zombies
/testfor @e[type=zombie,(r for PE, distance for PC)=20]
This will test for all zombies within a 20 block radius. Radius is building that many blocks off the sides and connecting them to a cube. Thus displaying radius. Than have a comparator coming out of the command block and redstone repeater followed by a solid block with a redstone torch
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
1
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selectorrshould be substituted withdistancefor java edition is not required, since/testforhas been replaced with/executein the Java edition.
– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
Also, please don't usetestforeven in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other thantestfor.
– MBraedley
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "41"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344556%2fhow-do-i-test-for-when-someone-kills-all-of-the-zombies-in-an-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A solution I found is that you can do a command testfor this will test for entities:
/testfor @e[type=zombie]
This will test for all currently loaded zombies
/testfor @e[type=zombie,(r for PE, distance for PC)=20]
This will test for all zombies within a 20 block radius. Radius is building that many blocks off the sides and connecting them to a cube. Thus displaying radius. Than have a comparator coming out of the command block and redstone repeater followed by a solid block with a redstone torch
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
1
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selectorrshould be substituted withdistancefor java edition is not required, since/testforhas been replaced with/executein the Java edition.
– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
Also, please don't usetestforeven in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other thantestfor.
– MBraedley
13 hours ago
add a comment |
A solution I found is that you can do a command testfor this will test for entities:
/testfor @e[type=zombie]
This will test for all currently loaded zombies
/testfor @e[type=zombie,(r for PE, distance for PC)=20]
This will test for all zombies within a 20 block radius. Radius is building that many blocks off the sides and connecting them to a cube. Thus displaying radius. Than have a comparator coming out of the command block and redstone repeater followed by a solid block with a redstone torch
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
1
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selectorrshould be substituted withdistancefor java edition is not required, since/testforhas been replaced with/executein the Java edition.
– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
Also, please don't usetestforeven in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other thantestfor.
– MBraedley
13 hours ago
add a comment |
A solution I found is that you can do a command testfor this will test for entities:
/testfor @e[type=zombie]
This will test for all currently loaded zombies
/testfor @e[type=zombie,(r for PE, distance for PC)=20]
This will test for all zombies within a 20 block radius. Radius is building that many blocks off the sides and connecting them to a cube. Thus displaying radius. Than have a comparator coming out of the command block and redstone repeater followed by a solid block with a redstone torch
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
A solution I found is that you can do a command testfor this will test for entities:
/testfor @e[type=zombie]
This will test for all currently loaded zombies
/testfor @e[type=zombie,(r for PE, distance for PC)=20]
This will test for all zombies within a 20 block radius. Radius is building that many blocks off the sides and connecting them to a cube. Thus displaying radius. Than have a comparator coming out of the command block and redstone repeater followed by a solid block with a redstone torch
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
edited Jan 8 at 3:36
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
answered Jan 7 at 14:34
BratworstBratworst
9111
9111
1
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selectorrshould be substituted withdistancefor java edition is not required, since/testforhas been replaced with/executein the Java edition.
– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
Also, please don't usetestforeven in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other thantestfor.
– MBraedley
13 hours ago
add a comment |
1
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selectorrshould be substituted withdistancefor java edition is not required, since/testforhas been replaced with/executein the Java edition.
– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
Also, please don't usetestforeven in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other thantestfor.
– MBraedley
13 hours ago
1
1
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selector
r should be substituted with distance for java edition is not required, since /testfor has been replaced with /execute in the Java edition.– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
As the question states, the post is for bedrock edition. Specifying that the selector
r should be substituted with distance for java edition is not required, since /testfor has been replaced with /execute in the Java edition.– Jayden
Jan 9 at 1:59
Also, please don't use
testfor even in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other than testfor.– MBraedley
13 hours ago
Also, please don't use
testfor even in versions of Minecraft that support it unless you really know what you're doing. It should be considered to be deprecated, as its utility is almost entirely dependent on conditional command blocks, which can't be used directly in functions. There are almost always better ways to solve a problem by using something other than testfor.– MBraedley
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Arqade!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344556%2fhow-do-i-test-for-when-someone-kills-all-of-the-zombies-in-an-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
What do you mean all the mobs in an "area"? Could you test and see if there are no zombies in a radius from a block and then run commands, or do you have to test something else?
– SpiceWeasel
Jan 6 at 20:42