In vanilla Minecraft 1.12.2, without using other tools, is there a way to remove one block and change it with...
In Minecraft 1.12.2, is there a way to remove a series of stone and change it with air without breaking or changing other blocks?
minecraft
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
add a comment |
In Minecraft 1.12.2, is there a way to remove a series of stone and change it with air without breaking or changing other blocks?
minecraft
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
1
@MBraedley i'd argue it's only a related question, as it wants a way to do it without updating/changing nearby blocks.
– moonheart08
Mar 18 at 15:12
@moonheart08 No, I don't think they're talking about avoiding block updates.
– Fabian Röling
Mar 18 at 16:19
1
Primarily, this question asks about doing it without external tools. While the other - just the opposite.
– SF.
Mar 19 at 11:20
add a comment |
In Minecraft 1.12.2, is there a way to remove a series of stone and change it with air without breaking or changing other blocks?
minecraft
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
In Minecraft 1.12.2, is there a way to remove a series of stone and change it with air without breaking or changing other blocks?
minecraft
minecraft
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
edited 12 mins ago
Schism
9,903125371
9,903125371
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
asked Mar 18 at 14:54
Matterify ProductionsMatterify Productions
91
91
1
@MBraedley i'd argue it's only a related question, as it wants a way to do it without updating/changing nearby blocks.
– moonheart08
Mar 18 at 15:12
@moonheart08 No, I don't think they're talking about avoiding block updates.
– Fabian Röling
Mar 18 at 16:19
1
Primarily, this question asks about doing it without external tools. While the other - just the opposite.
– SF.
Mar 19 at 11:20
add a comment |
1
@MBraedley i'd argue it's only a related question, as it wants a way to do it without updating/changing nearby blocks.
– moonheart08
Mar 18 at 15:12
@moonheart08 No, I don't think they're talking about avoiding block updates.
– Fabian Röling
Mar 18 at 16:19
1
Primarily, this question asks about doing it without external tools. While the other - just the opposite.
– SF.
Mar 19 at 11:20
1
1
@MBraedley i'd argue it's only a related question, as it wants a way to do it without updating/changing nearby blocks.
– moonheart08
Mar 18 at 15:12
@MBraedley i'd argue it's only a related question, as it wants a way to do it without updating/changing nearby blocks.
– moonheart08
Mar 18 at 15:12
@moonheart08 No, I don't think they're talking about avoiding block updates.
– Fabian Röling
Mar 18 at 16:19
@moonheart08 No, I don't think they're talking about avoiding block updates.
– Fabian Röling
Mar 18 at 16:19
1
1
Primarily, this question asks about doing it without external tools. While the other - just the opposite.
– SF.
Mar 19 at 11:20
Primarily, this question asks about doing it without external tools. While the other - just the opposite.
– SF.
Mar 19 at 11:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I, personally, only know of one way, and I do not believe it fulfills the second criteria (No changing other blocks) to a point, but it's the best you can get without MCEdit or WorldEdit
setblock
The setblock command allows you to replace one block with another block of any type when cheats are enabled. It will also tick other blocks nearby the replaced block to allow them to update and adjust to the newly added block.
It's syntax is as follows (May not be precise, cannot see wiki right now)
/setblock <posx> <posy> <posz> <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
An easy way to replace a block is to simply replace the block directly under you, using ~, the Relative Position variable.
/setblock ~ ~-1 ~ <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
You can add or subtract numbers from ~ to change the position to where you like.
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "41"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f347911%2fin-vanilla-minecraft-1-12-2-without-using-other-tools-is-there-a-way-to-remove%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I, personally, only know of one way, and I do not believe it fulfills the second criteria (No changing other blocks) to a point, but it's the best you can get without MCEdit or WorldEdit
setblock
The setblock command allows you to replace one block with another block of any type when cheats are enabled. It will also tick other blocks nearby the replaced block to allow them to update and adjust to the newly added block.
It's syntax is as follows (May not be precise, cannot see wiki right now)
/setblock <posx> <posy> <posz> <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
An easy way to replace a block is to simply replace the block directly under you, using ~, the Relative Position variable.
/setblock ~ ~-1 ~ <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
You can add or subtract numbers from ~ to change the position to where you like.
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
add a comment |
I, personally, only know of one way, and I do not believe it fulfills the second criteria (No changing other blocks) to a point, but it's the best you can get without MCEdit or WorldEdit
setblock
The setblock command allows you to replace one block with another block of any type when cheats are enabled. It will also tick other blocks nearby the replaced block to allow them to update and adjust to the newly added block.
It's syntax is as follows (May not be precise, cannot see wiki right now)
/setblock <posx> <posy> <posz> <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
An easy way to replace a block is to simply replace the block directly under you, using ~, the Relative Position variable.
/setblock ~ ~-1 ~ <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
You can add or subtract numbers from ~ to change the position to where you like.
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
add a comment |
I, personally, only know of one way, and I do not believe it fulfills the second criteria (No changing other blocks) to a point, but it's the best you can get without MCEdit or WorldEdit
setblock
The setblock command allows you to replace one block with another block of any type when cheats are enabled. It will also tick other blocks nearby the replaced block to allow them to update and adjust to the newly added block.
It's syntax is as follows (May not be precise, cannot see wiki right now)
/setblock <posx> <posy> <posz> <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
An easy way to replace a block is to simply replace the block directly under you, using ~, the Relative Position variable.
/setblock ~ ~-1 ~ <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
You can add or subtract numbers from ~ to change the position to where you like.
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
I, personally, only know of one way, and I do not believe it fulfills the second criteria (No changing other blocks) to a point, but it's the best you can get without MCEdit or WorldEdit
setblock
The setblock command allows you to replace one block with another block of any type when cheats are enabled. It will also tick other blocks nearby the replaced block to allow them to update and adjust to the newly added block.
It's syntax is as follows (May not be precise, cannot see wiki right now)
/setblock <posx> <posy> <posz> <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
An easy way to replace a block is to simply replace the block directly under you, using ~, the Relative Position variable.
/setblock ~ ~-1 ~ <newblock>[state=value] [<mode>]
You can add or subtract numbers from ~ to change the position to where you like.
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
answered Mar 18 at 15:02
moonheart08moonheart08
1012
1012
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Arqade!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f347911%2fin-vanilla-minecraft-1-12-2-without-using-other-tools-is-there-a-way-to-remove%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
@MBraedley i'd argue it's only a related question, as it wants a way to do it without updating/changing nearby blocks.
– moonheart08
Mar 18 at 15:12
@moonheart08 No, I don't think they're talking about avoiding block updates.
– Fabian Röling
Mar 18 at 16:19
1
Primarily, this question asks about doing it without external tools. While the other - just the opposite.
– SF.
Mar 19 at 11:20